<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shooting People &#187; Documentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/tag/documentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog</link>
	<description>Shooting People : Independent Filmmakers Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:55:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Future Artists talkin up a digital revolution &#8211; The third way, time to change the beat.</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/08/future-artists-talkin-up-a-digital-revolution-the-third-way-time-to-change-the-beat/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/08/future-artists-talkin-up-a-digital-revolution-the-third-way-time-to-change-the-beat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markashmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bfi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands & Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark ashmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UKFC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Project lost generation – a project with a new beat This article a perfect introduction to a variety of future artists workshops that will take place in Leeds, Birminghamduring October and at Channel 4 in London during November. The digital campfire – a social revolution with its own beat. (By  Mark Ashmore FRSA 29/8/11) In this essay I will explore how social communications and convergence culture has put a greater emphasis on storytelling, creating a 3rd tier content distribution network, which is unrecognised by traditional<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/08/future-artists-talkin-up-a-digital-revolution-the-third-way-time-to-change-the-beat/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?attachment_id=1010" rel="attachment wp-att-1010"><img class="aligncenter" title="project lost generation" src="http://futureartists.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/textplacement1-473x670.jpg" alt="" width="473" height="670" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.projectlostgeneration.co.uk/" target="_blank">Project lost generation – a project with a new beat</a></p>
<p><strong>This article a perfect introduction to a variety of <a href="http://www.futureartists.co.uk" target="_blank">future artists</a> workshops that will take place in <a href="http://futureartists.co.uk/2011/05/07/film-and-transmedia-director-workshops-tour/" target="_blank">Leeds, Birmingham</a>during October and at <a href="http://4talent.channel4.com/extra/fasat" target="_blank">Channel 4 in London during November.</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>The digital campfire – a social revolution with its own beat. (By  <a href="http://twitter.com/futureartists">Mark Ashmore </a>FRSA 29/8/11)</p>
<p>In this essay I will explore how social communications and convergence culture has put a greater emphasis on storytelling, creating a 3<sup>rd</sup> tier content distribution network, which is unrecognised by traditional broadcast media and its funders, but participated in by an ever growing audience connected directly to the artist.</p>
<p>I will explore how as a content producer or artist (across film, music, art, literature, game etc) you are about to revolutionise liner/ non liner narrative and be part of a new emerging and ground breaking industry.</p>
<p>But only if you move to your own beat.</p>
<p>So you have discovered this article because someone has ‘shared’ it with you, or maybe you where in the digital wilderness and you ‘stumbled’ across it as you ‘searched’ via google, or maybe you saw that someone ‘liked’ it and out of curiosity thought you would check it out, all terms you should be familiar with if you use social media, you have just entered a digital camp fire.</p>
<p>Welcome <img src="http://futureartists.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" /></p>
<p>These terms are nothing new, what happens in the online world, the rules, the terminology and more important the actions they represent, are the same as community engagement in the real world, and thus I must stress at this point that online social/community tools and their usage are the same as their real world counterpart,</p>
<p>for example, a 140 character tweet about ‘you need to watch my acting showreel’ is the same as interrupting a group of random strangers in a packed coffee shop and telling them ‘you need to watch me perform like a monkey’,</p>
<p>alas, the constant facebook updates telling the world how ‘great’ you are, are the same as a real world situation in which you dominate the conversation by telling people ‘how great you are’ as you spill coffee down their white shirt.</p>
<p>Nobody likes a show off.</p>
<p>this must be at the forefront of the mind throughout its usage and when reading this essay.</p>
<p>So you have found a start of a conversation, this blog is my opinion, but later you can give yours.</p>
<p>New world, old rules.</p>
<p>Anyway we could spend an entire chapter looking at the fu pars and do’s and don’ts of correct usage of social media, but that’s not the point, as long as you use it, in a good or bad way, you are engaging in the digital camp fire, its just that people WILL decide your status in the online community,</p>
<p>I would also like to stress that your writer here is no angel when it comes to social media, so I’m defiantly not a judge.</p>
<p>Back beat the word is on the street,</p>
<p>I am a story teller,</p>
<p>I use a variety of art to communicate what I have to say, I in turn help others to have a voice (paid and unpaid) and in doing so, the art of story as a medium of communication connects with whoever happens to be in my path.</p>
<p>They either like it, hate it, or are indifferent to it, none the less they have experienced it, heard the story, any reaction is a result.</p>
<p>But its this result, that the story teller yearns for, the point of practising the art form, it is this connection with an audience, that for the past 100 years has been guarded for both power and profit by a small group of individuals, I call them the elite,</p>
<p>for those that control the stories, control the world.</p>
<p>Freedom of speech – stories of the street.</p>
<p>200 years of urbanisation and globalisation has seen the way communities in the industrial world work, rest and play completely change.</p>
<p>Freedom of speech is so full of censorship, propaganda and mis-information, and not to forget all the sources are controlled and distributed by very few people, the artists that work within this construct have had to constantly evolve with these increasing  challenges and changes, indoing so, at certain  times, moving away from the original expression and intent,</p>
<p>to demonstrate where we are now, we need to see where we have been.</p>
<p>What follows is in no way a definitive time line of human communication, but should at least give you the understanding to the point I will illustrate later in this essay, and for those at the back of the class remember the keywords of human communication ‘Share or pass on’, ‘Search or to look for’, ‘like or have an opinion on’</p>
<p>Cave Paintings are Prehistoric Cinema, highly skilled artists creating images that reflect stories of that time, stories deemed that important that they where painted in caves to be preserved for generations to learn and ‘share’ ideas from,</p>
<p>to this day historians can get a glimpse into pre-history from these paintings. Cave paintings are a valuable story telling tool for an historic, social and artistic view point.</p>
<p>The artists shared these images with their community, but people would have to search for them as they where buried in caves, and if they liked them, their meaning and location would be shared with others, because they liked it, thus creating a cycle of human interaction with the media.</p>
<p>Oral History</p>
<p>All human cultures have a rich oral or verbal story telling tradition, infact the genesis of camp fire stories is the ability to articulate a story via verbal communication, every story starts with a ‘once upon a time moment’, and those stories deemed worthy enough to be documented are then incased in writing,</p>
<p>At one point in time, only the stories of nobility or religious authority would be written, as it was these sectors of society that had the ability and understanding of the written word, for thousands of years human history if written down was of an elitist perspective. The stories of the workers did’nt get a look in.</p>
<p>Stories shared in a group, re-told verbally as the people could not write. Stories shared in a group where scholars could write then down, where then stored or shared in more elitist surroundings.</p>
<p>The printed word changed this.</p>
<p>Pre 1450, before the invention of the printing press, printing was done in an individual, case by case basis, with printed works placed amongst the elite and not shared with anyone outside of that circle,</p>
<p>this all changed in 1450 with Guttenberg’s printing press, the written word would be available to the masses, if they could read, but more importantly printing, allowed for cartoons, pictures, drawings, images easily understood by the  those that can not read to be freely distributed, the next 500 years post printing press would see a revolution in thinking, society, and modern culture, and the invention of copyright and censorship (by those old elitist’s)</p>
<p>along came the analogue revolution</p>
<p>Late 19<sup>th</sup> century culture saw the emergence of radio, photography and early cinema, more tools for artistic expression, and more ways for stories to be told.</p>
<p>these communication tools would radically begin to be censored, either by licenses, bureaucracy or in a respect to what type of content would be deemed suitable for the person on the receiving end of the artists communiqué, even up until the 1970s the BBC would broadcast in a very distinct BBC voice, aka elitist, where they talking down to the working class?</p>
<p>And this control would continue, with every breakthrough in science which would allow artists to progress their own thinking and expression via invention of new technology, such as television and cable tv, in would come restrictions in the form of censorship or gatekeepers.</p>
<p>This would see a rise in underground or counterculture society, although counter culture has always existed side by side with mainstream culture throughout the ages of communication and art, it is the 1960s counter culture revolution which seemed to breakthrough on all fronts,</p>
<p>from the written word and tradition’s of folk poems/music to rock n roll music, to theatre, art, and cinema, this counter culture change which grew from the various new wave movements (civil rights, war, sexual revolution, equality, social revolution) to name but a few, along with a post war generation of 20 something’s, found themselves in the right place at the right time, to bring the noise.</p>
<p>And its from this counterculture revolution that the ultimate communication tool would arrive, the internet. Built as a communication tool that could be used in the event of cold war nuclear attack,</p>
<p>the internet is a system with no central control, and thus can not be destroyed by being a traditional central target, the internet is an ever spreading entity, version upon version, constantly evolving and changing, and in doing so has now brought with it old opportunities to communicate without the restrictions and baggage of the past.</p>
<p>But with every new technology revolution, comes the old elitist guard wanting to shut down the party, its just this time, we out number them.</p>
<p>Who has the right to tell your story.</p>
<p>Ok so, what I have tried to illustrate, be it rather crudely, is that humans have always communicated via artistic expression as a means of evolving their community, 10,000 years ago, this could have been a camp fire story,</p>
<p>Imagine…</p>
<p>Gathered round at the end of the day, after a hard days hunting,</p>
<p>hunter gathers are sharing the tales of the day</p>
<p>‘don’t go down to the water well in spring, as it is full of lion cubs protected by their angry mother, the lioness will kill you’,</p>
<p>‘why’ someone asks,</p>
<p>and from this, a story is told</p>
<p>‘ a young warrior, brave and fearless, but did not listen to the wise one who told of the lioness and her cubs at the waters edge during spring’,</p>
<p>this camp fire story both a warning in how the immediate surroundings work and that you should always listen to the ‘wise’ storyteller, may come from a tradition the reader might think is extinct, but its still with us, it just that the culture of camp fire is no longer with us, no longer required, no longer deemed necessary, maybe not in practice but at a subconscious level it will always be with us, its human nature, thus control the stories, control human nature, and here is why.</p>
<p>What has evolved now is the digital camp fire, fragmented groups/individuals with similar interests, are being brought together on a massive scale around the glowing embers of social media, this new mainstream phenomenon has only come about in the past 4 years online,</p>
<p>NO you scream, yes sir, cast your thinking back,</p>
<p>my argument is that now the mainstream are all interconnected via smart phones and laptops and endless wifi, now that the mainstream, from grandparents to parents, to younger brothers and sisters and to family friends who can’t work a washing machine but can update a facebook status,</p>
<p>what we have seen that has happened in the last 4 years is that computer science, has gone from the geeky IT crowd, to the mainstream world of celebrity, once the face of computers was Bill Gates with stereotype nerd glasses, his mums knitted sweater and traveling sales men slacks,</p>
<p>Now the face of computing is facebook founder Mark Zuckerburg, a 26 year old billionaire, and now movie star, well by default, or Steve Jobs ex CEO of Apple, who turned the humble grey box of a PC into a designer must have item, Jobs is responsible for turning entire shopping malls into star trek conventions, everyone has a communication device, everyone holds a computer set to text, skype, facebook or stun via a flash on the camera phone.</p>
<p>This radical culture change in the past 4 years, has seen a new culture develop, and I would like to declare it the digital camp fire, a place to share stories.</p>
<p>Social media has sex appeal, its rock and roll, its content is diverse, interesting and radical, across all spectrums, it can be as geeky as the code it has been built upon, or it can be cat videos on youtube, its diversity and accessibility is the key to its mainstream success,</p>
<p>and best of all it has been built by the people, the internet is the embodiment of a city community, cities as geographers will tell you, are built as you need bits, you don’t build the shops till you have the industry, and only when do you have industry do you build the homes, the same goes for the internet,</p>
<p>Now user generated content in the form of everything from blogs, video, audio, etc out numbers the output of any major media producer, youtube contains more video than all the major broadcasters put together, it even includes some of the major broadcasters video!.</p>
<p>So what changed, we went from being the served to the servers.</p>
<p>Put simply the digital campfire is a way to describe a connected community, that gather on the city scape of the internet, around the camp fire with access to everything. with the ability to act in the same way as a real world camp fire community, where the same value systems and support networks are present, just like the old days! Yes technology for a while took us forward and created a fragmented TV dinner society, but a counter culture revolution took place right under the noses of the mainstream media and the rug got pulled back, back to a place it should always be,</p>
<p>This digital community with all its levels and layers present, instead of a one size fits all, 4 channel TV existence, which could be deemed as a dictatorship or at best an autocratic one by the mainstream global media corporations, we are going back to the roots of a diverse, dynamic community which is interconnected and disconnected, a diverse community made up of ever expanding niches, which debates, argues and has opinion, this now takes us into a world where a thousand individuals can set consumer choice instead of a handful of elite gatekeepers making a choice for us. (well it can if we use a variety of platforms to build our digital community on, and not just facebook)</p>
<p>Established media talks of an ever expanding fragmented ‘media landscape’ they look out and go</p>
<p>‘that was all once a land mass, we could plant out giant bill board advertising Harry Potter in the middle, and all those on that the land would see it and go spend £10 on watching it, now the landmass is split into a thousand pieces, where do we put the giant billboard now!’</p>
<p>But for us around the our digital campfire on our own private island, cut off and fragmented as we wish,</p>
<p>We look at this and go</p>
<p>‘I no longer have to endure that giant Harry Potter billboard in the centre of my eyeline, instead, I can choose to hang out on which ever island I wish, take part in what ever is going off in each of these new spaces, and not be interrupted by Harry Potter’</p>
<p>and most of the time, these spaces at best, don’t have mainstream media involved in them at all, those that truly opt out grow fastest.</p>
<p>So what the hell does this have to do with campfire’s.</p>
<p>Back beat the word is on the street</p>
<p>The word on the street, the word around the camp fire, the word is the word, the word is an expression of an idea, an idea comes from a theme, and themes are explored by a community.</p>
<p>We gather around the safety of a place we know, a camp fire is safe and warm, a digital camp fire is a place of like minds and shared knowledge, it’s a safe place to express yourself, it’s a place online.</p>
<p>This exploration to express can take part in the real world, where groups and individuals can meet, or if they are unable to meet because the community is fragmented by either location or time, then these explorations of theme can take place online in a digital space, either on twitter by using a # (hastag) as a conversation marker, in a facebook group, on a forum or in a blog conversation, or even in video on youtube and a host of new video blog services.</p>
<p>It is this word on the street, this word around the digital camp fire that if interesting enough, will as it is shared person by person begin to form the basis of a new peer to peer content distribution network for a new emerging film industry, it is this now that I have given context to my argument, that I know want to share with you, for the rest of this essay.</p>
<p>In the past 4 years a 3<sup>rd</sup> tier of a film industry model has slowly been evolving,</p>
<p>I call it a 3<sup>rd</sup> tier as I see the top tier as being mainly Hollywood film 100 million + budgets, made for the multiplex, sequels, spectacles and star vehicles to service the PR press that sustains them,</p>
<p>the 2<sup>nd</sup> tier are more conservative budget films, majority can be classed as European/world cinema or art house movies, in this 2<sup>nd</sup> tier are also the straight to DVD titles.</p>
<p>But what has emerged and has been documented in many indy film-making articles on the DIY scene, is now a new 3<sup>rd</sup> pier of film-making, which is becoming ever more vibrant as technology progresses,</p>
<p>An Industry that uses a new wave of thinking as its currency, new digital tools of communication and even new types of story telling to get its point across, this vibrant and new film/content industry is so new it is yet to be defined and those that practice it are labeled with a variety of media tags, by the main stream media, cross platform, transmedia etc, but its this 3<sup>rd</sup> tier which I believe will be the new mainstream in just 4 years time.</p>
<p>And here is why.</p>
<p>The rules of 3<sup>rd</sup> tier film production</p>
<p>1)    Owning the means of production – the DSLR film revolution is the equivalent of the 16mm film revolution of the French new wave, cheap portable cameras, instant digital files ready for editing on portable laptops in an instant. Nobody can tell you what to shoot.</p>
<p>2)    Owning the means to distribution free of censorship, 3<sup>rd</sup> tier film making is censorship free, instead of big brother dictating content, taste and decency its now peer to peer review, if your project does not fit with one peer group, another group might like it, online video is sharable and free to replicate.</p>
<p>3)    Owning the means to PR – social media if done correctly is not an exercise in ‘me’ culture, instead your public relationships should be a two way conversation, and at best your public/audience should also become your collaborators, way before the screening, ideally from the idea stage.</p>
<p>4)    Digital networks enable the film making process to be outsourced across the world, a film made in London, can outsource its special effects to a group in Texas, amateurs and hobbyists they might be, but with the same SFX packages as the mainstream media the results can be the same or even better.</p>
<p>5)    Raising finance – film making used to be a costly game, new producers have lowered the costs of production and distribution meaning less finance is required, if the themes and ideas are not catered for in the mainstream, then finance can be raised in a variety of ways, from the begging bowl tactics of ‘give me £10 to make my film I will give you a DVD when its done’, to more innovative takes on crowd funding. From partnering up with established players in that market, to brand the project, share networks, to negotiating pro bona kit and talent, or sell non film-making goods and services around the film, from t-shirts to seminars to screenings of films that relate to the films subject matter. All sustained by the vibrant community and culture active around your own digital camp fire.</p>
<p>6)    Exhibition – the cinema was once the preserve of the elite, but the modern 21<sup>st</sup> century cinema is not the multiplex, digital HD projectors and blu ray players mean that cinema can be anywhere, from a park or beach, to cave or scout hut, a cinema can be anywhere where people gather, a cinema is a story being told around a camp fire. Get your community off online and into the real world, meetup’s around cinema are great ice breakers.</p>
<p>7)    Exhibition networks – social media allows for groups with their own cinema spaces be it pop up or established venue, places and people with their own audiences to now link up with 3<sup>rd</sup> tier content creators, to play a gig circuit, film-makers become like a band, the film-makers can either turn up and show the film themselves, or at best the themes and ideas of the project will have been known by the exhibitor group since its inception via social media interaction, and thus they will be able to introduce the project to an audience, the great thing about this is that screenings can take place anywhere in the world, and the content can be e-mailed, shared via yousend it, or even given to them as a bit torrent.</p>
<p>8)    You and your audience operate in the same space, your audience have the ability to create as you do, and thus must be treated with respect, why share or show them a story or piece of artwork that they can easily create or manufacture themselves, story is key, this is a great place for the art form to progress and this is why we see the constant rise of artistic expression via transmedia and ‘new wave’ cinema being explored by artists from around the world, artists no longer asking permission, if the audience can make it, share it themselves they easily could be part of the 3<sup>rd</sup> tier, so if you want to be the best you can be, you have to raise your game and experiment.</p>
<p>9)    VOD is the new DVD, itunes for so long ruled the roost on VOD and very few platforms allowed for producers to make a decent return on their content, with Daily Motion now trying to attract high quality videos and sharing advertising revenue, you tube gearing up for its evolution on google tv by publicizing its partnership program more and more and the likes of dynamo player and distrify allowing for producers to control all the distribution and price point for content with really good splits, means that video producers can now put VOD into the business plan. And more importantly share directly with their digital camp fire community at various stages of the creation process.</p>
<p>10)                   The most important rule of all, is don’t treat your audience as dumb, the 3<sup>rd</sup> tier has been created as a reaction to the elitist mainstream who feed their audiences with the same reality TV, films based on theme park rides and tv shows and recycled remade stories, dare to be different and if you allow the conditions on social media, your audience will support you, they might not like what you make, but they might like you as a person, as an artist, it’s the personal, the knowing you, that will allow you to thrive and survive around the digital camp fire.</p>
<p>And you know you have a thriving 3<sup>rd</sup> tier film-making industry when you see 1<sup>st</sup> tier and 2<sup>nd</sup> tier attempts at copying the underground from the way the film is created, its marketing, its distribution etc,</p>
<p>but like a good goldsmith, you the audience will be able to spot a fake a mile off!</p>
<p>Does this make sense, we can talk about this tweet me @futureartists</p>
<p>Ok so what I have tried to illustrate is that you as a storyteller and artist are free without restrictions except for the baggage that you bring to your own art practice yourself,</p>
<p>we have come full circle in the evolution of the camp fire, from small community groups sharing ideas, themes and stories around a nightly camp fire in real time, to the 21<sup>st</sup> century digital space, that allows for global fragmented groups and individuals to gather and converse in storytelling in whatever media form they choose, whether it be the written tweet, the tagged picture, the free youtube content or the VOD that has value to a community, the gate keepers have now gone,</p>
<p>What exists is a very interesting and vibrant 3<sup>rd</sup> tier of film makers a list of which I will provide at the bottom of this essay. This 3<sup>rd</sup> tier is looked down upon by a film industry only interested in making a financial profit to support a large framework, and a lot of people in it purely for the profit and not for the art of story telling, in my heart I wish to see this crumble, an industry that treats its audience as idiots giving it substandard fare at a high price and starving the competition out of the game via a monopoly on supply and distribution, is not a very cultural diverse place to be,</p>
<p>I feel its our job as 3<sup>rd</sup> tier film industry to win over our audience and turn them into supporters and educate them as best we can into the choices they have available to them, and with more and more film-makers realizing the power they now have, its time to stop chasing down what was, and start working on what can be, so start ‘sharing’, ‘like’, and search for new voices and support them with ideas, encouragement and pay for their work, on DVD, VOD or at a screening near you.</p>
<p>I hope to see you at our own underground culture Oscars one day, celebrating a new wave of cinema, created from global culture, a meting pot of stories, presented in new entertaining and thought provoking ways,</p>
<p>Ways that the mainstream will have to copy one day to keep up.</p>
<p>It will do us all a world of good, in times of great change new opportunities arise, a new beat if you will.</p>
<p>The digital campfire – a social revolution with its own beat, and spread the beat, please RE-TWEET, POST ON FACEBOOK and E-mail the URL to your own camp fire community, the more the word on the street gets out, the better the art that emerges from the 3<sup>rd</sup> tier becomes.</p>
<p>Mark Ashmore FRSA Co founder of <a href="http://www.futureartists.co.uk" target="_blank">Future Artists LTD</a> / <a href="http://www.meetup.com/futureartists" target="_blank">Future Artists live creative Co-Op</a>.</p>
<p>Tweet us <a href="http://www.twitter/futureartists" target="_blank">@futureartists</a></p>
<p>Further projects of the 3rd tier film-making revolution, projects of note</p>
<p><a href="http://4talent.channel4.com/extra/fasat" target="_blank">Invisible Circus: No Dress Rehearsal (distributed by Future Artists)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://justdoitfilm.com/" target="_blank">Just do it: a tale of modern outlaws</a> (Emily James)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.presspauseplay.com/" target="_blank">Press, Pause, Play</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.projectlostgeneration.co.uk/" target="_blank">Project Lost Generation</a> (By Articles writer Mark Ashmore)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sounditoutdoc.com/" target="_blank">Sound it out doc</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.peoplevsgeorge.com/splash/" target="_blank">The People Vs George Lucas</a></p>
<p>let us know about your and we will add it to the list! @futureartists</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/08/future-artists-talkin-up-a-digital-revolution-the-third-way-time-to-change-the-beat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New fund for interactive, non-fiction projects</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/04/new-fund-for-interactive-non-fiction-projects/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/04/new-fund-for-interactive-non-fiction-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ingrid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Hip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storytelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TFI New Media Fund]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/category/fromthehip/?p=604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been consulting on the TFI New Media Fund, a new fund for non-fiction interactive or cross-platform projects that focus on a social issue. I&#8217;ve been interested in this space for the last few years and it&#8217;s fantastic that funders are now coming to the table to support this kind of work. If you&#8217;re interested in applying read the FAQ for more information about the kind of work the Fund will support. The idea is to bring storytelling, design and<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/04/new-fund-for-interactive-non-fiction-projects/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been consulting on the <a href="http://www.tribecafilminstitute.org/filmmakers/newmedia/" target="_blank">TFI New Media Fund</a>, a new fund for non-fiction interactive or cross-platform projects that focus on a social issue. I&#8217;ve been interested in this space for the last few years and it&#8217;s fantastic that funders are now coming to the table to support this kind of work. If you&#8217;re interested in applying read the <a href="http://dashboard.tribecafilminstitute.org/pages/faq_newmedia" target="_blank">FAQ</a> for more information about the kind of work the Fund will support. The idea is to bring storytelling, design and impact together through technology. When this stuff works it is very exciting and it brings new audiences to documentary!</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in looking at some projects to give you an idea of the kind of work I&#8217;ve been inspired by here are a few sites to check out (these aren&#8217;t necessarily the sort of projects the Fund would support by the way, but they are examples of interesting interactive storytelling &#8211; some, like <em>The Waiting Room</em> and <em>18 Days in Egypt</em> are works in progress):</p>
<p><a href="http://interactive.nfb.ca/#/outmywindow/" target="_blank">Out My Window</a></p>
<p><a href="http://interactive.nfb.ca/#/outmywindow"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-616" title="highrise-out-my-window-screenshot1-e1287250443529" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/highrise-out-my-window-screenshot1-e1287250443529.png" alt="" width="500" height="258" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://interactive.nfb.ca/#/pinepoint" target="_blank">Welcome to Pine Point</a></p>
<p><a href="http://interactive.nfb.ca/#/pinepoint"><img class="size-full wp-image-605 alignnone" title="nfb_pinepoint_s-on35" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/nfb_pinepoint_s-on35.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="319" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatruwaitingfor.com" target="_blank">The Waiting Room</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatruwaitingfor.com"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-615" title="Picture 3" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Picture-3.png" alt="" width="500" height="317" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://prisonvalley.arte.tv/?lang=en" target="_blank">Prison Valley</a></p>
<p><a href="http://prisonvalley.arte.tv/?lang=en"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-614" title="prisval1" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/prisval1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="294" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thewildernessdowntown.com/" target="_blank">The Wilderness Downtown</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thewildernessdowntown.com/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-613" title="the-wilderness-downtown-2-580x367" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/the-wilderness-downtown-2-580x367.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>Crowdsourcing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.18daysinegypt.com/" target="_blank">18 Days in Egypt</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.18daysinegypt.com/"><img class="size-full wp-image-606 alignnone" title="Picture 2" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Picture-2.png" alt="" width="500" height="286" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.starwarsuncut.com/" target="_blank">Star Wars Uncut</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.starwarsuncut.com/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-611" title="hansolo_greedo_starwars_uncut1" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/hansolo_greedo_starwars_uncut1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thejohnnycashproject.com/" target="_blank">The Johnny Cash Project</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.thejohnnycashproject.com/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-612" title="MILK+KOBLIN_TheJohnnyCashProject011" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/MILK+KOBLIN_TheJohnnyCashProject011.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="313" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/lifeinaday" target="_blank">Life in a Day</a></p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="500" height="311" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/XMxuocCN1O0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>If you have other great examples please leave a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/04/new-fund-for-interactive-non-fiction-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opening Weekends Are Not For Wimps!</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/opening-weekends-are-not-for-wimps/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/opening-weekends-are-not-for-wimps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>debs@catsiye.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Africa United - first time feature of a Shooting People member since 2002 - opening in UK cinemas this weekend, and... well, have a read and see what you think. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone told me 18 months ago that a film I directed would have just opened in over 200 screens across the UK &#8211; complete with bus and tv ads &#8211; I pretty much wouldn&#8217;t have believed them. It&#8217;s been a crazy journey &#8211; from short films and one-line idea to feature cinema release in less than 2 years &#8211; but here we are.<br />
<br />
<div id="attachment_550" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="www.africaunitedmovie.com"><img class="size-medium wp-image-550" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/AUpre-release-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Africa United is in UK cinemas from Oct 22nd</p></div><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.africaunitedmovie.com/">AFRICA UNITED</a> has had a brilliant audience response in previews and our Toronto and London premieres &#8211; we had standing ovations in both premieres, and scored more highly in the official test screening than any family film the screening organisation had ever tested &#8211; but the film has split critics. The argument seems mostly to be that you shouldn&#8217;t deal openly with issues of HIV, child soldiers etc etc in a film that expects to find a family audience. I don&#8217;t agree, but it&#8217;s what a few of them think, and what they&#8217;ve printed. And &#8211; understandably &#8211; what a broad audience appears to have believed! We have just tanked on our opening weekend&#8230; We took significantly less than the wolf movie, and the owls left us for dust!<br />
<br />
This is sad for the following reasons:<br />
<br />
- Africa United is genuinely a really enjoyable and heart-warming film. It&#8217;s funny, naive, layered and post-modern, as well as being energetic and geared towards kids &#8211; most people both cry and laugh outloud during the 90 minutes<br />
<br />
- we tried to break the rules &amp; do something new. It&#8217;s part live-action, part-animation (animation created brilliantly by BlinkInk from recycled Rwandan stuff) &#8211; it has an awesome soundtrack from seriously talented composer/producer Bernie Gardner<br />
<br />
- we literally bust our asses making it &#8211; an 8 week shoot, in 3 african countries, 5 inexperienced kids in the lead roles, first-time director, first-time writer, intense post-schedule &#8211; jungles, explosions, hippos, lakes, visas, flash floods, 35mm, intense delivery dates, FIFA, the lot<br />
<br />
- football is the metaphor not the subject, but it&#8217;s a loving tribute to the beautiful game worldwide<br />
<br />
- if we make it to profit (unlikely, but still) we can give a full 25% of it to kids dealing with the issues touched on<br />
<br />
Shooting People has, in many ways, been my film school. I started trying to get into the UK film industry in 2002, and have been a shooter since then. My first jobs as a 1st AD on short film shoots were via the film-makers digests, and over the years I have used the discussion boards and member profiles to figure things out, crew and cast shorts, find a wonderful editor, hear out about masterclasses, attend festivals, and basically learn the ropes! I bought my Final Cut Pro system 2nd-hand here, and the digests have often felt like a bit of a lifeline to any kind of faint pulse of a film industry when things have been quiet.<br />
<br />
I&#8217;m not sure where AFRICA UNITED will go from here. We had a huge amount of exposure &#8211; and the amazing teams at Pathé and Freuds put everything behind it &#8211; but you win some, you lose some I guess!? It seems mad that it comes down to a weekend after all of this, but it does and we know it! In any case, I would love to know what you guys make of it. If you&#8217;re interested and willing to make a trip to the cinema this week &#8211; please do! And let me know what you think? Cinema listings should be up and available now, but from the weekend onwards &#8211; I can&#8217;t promise <img src='http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<br />
This comes with all best wishes, a big belief in collaboration and respect for everyone who says &#8216;why not&#8217; -<br />
<br />
<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/cards/catsiye">Debs Gardner-Paterson</a><br />
Shooting People member since &#8217;02 and director of &#8216;Africa United&#8217;<br />
<br />
<strong>&#8216;Africe United&#8217; is showing at the Frontline Club, Paddington, London on <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/calendar/index.php?mode=detail&#038;event=14580&#038;day=2010-11-15&#038;event_type=single">Monday 15 November</a>, with Debs introducing the screening followed by a special guest Q&amp;A.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/opening-weekends-are-not-for-wimps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Together We Are Stronger</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/together-we-are-stronger/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/together-we-are-stronger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filmmaker Emily James discusses how &#8216;together we are stronger&#8217; in the making of Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world - a feature documentary about climate activists, using crowd funding by donation and volunteer crew. Already there have been over 100 people who’ve given generously of their time and energy to make Just Do It happen, and no doubt there will be many more before we are done. We’ve had 31 camera people, 25 editors, 17 production volunteers,<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/together-we-are-stronger/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><br />
<em>Filmmaker <a href="http://www.emily-james.com/" target="_blank">Emily James</a></em><em> discusses how &#8216;together we are stronger&#8217; in the making of <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world </a></em><em>- a feature documentary about climate activists, using crowd funding by donation and volunteer crew.</em><br />
<span><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7qiP8Qr3hhE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7qiP8Qr3hhE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
<span><br />
Already there have been over 100 people who’ve given generously of their time and energy to make <em>Just Do It </em>happen, and no doubt there will be many more before we are done. We’ve had 31 camera people, 25 editors, 17 production volunteers, plus tons of other people helping with the website, with networking, with strategy, graphics, music, legal, press, and much more.<br />
<span><br />
Some of these people have been attracted to the subject of the film, others to the plans for <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a> release and the chance to help a worthwhile independent film project. For many of these people the non-profit nature of the film allows them to feel comfortable about giving their time, and in return it helps us to feel more comfortable about asking people for their help. Some of them talk about working on <em>Just Do It</em> as an ‘offset’ to their other, more commercial or corporate, but less emotionally rewarding work.  For those who make longer commitments to the project we always try to make sure that they are gaining skills that will be valuable to them elsewhere. But by and large, we all just want to see this film get made.<br />
</span><br />
A project of this sort is not particularly a model for how all films, or indeed any other film, could or should be made. It is by no means a particularly practical ‘business model’, nor is it ‘efficient’. It will take us much longer to make it this way, and we are constantly hamstrung by our lack of funds. But it is a testament to what groups of passionate and committed people can achieve, despite the odds.<br />
<span><br />
All of us who are making <em>Just Do </em>It really want the film to be made with true independence and without commercial or editorial pressure.  But much as we’d like to, we can’t pay our rent with fairy dust, or eat rainbows. And having decided to try to make the film <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-i-said-‘no’-to-the-broadcasters/" target="_blank">without a broadcaster</a>, and to support the Creative Commons movement through a non-commercial release, we eliminated many cash flow avenues.<br />
<span><br />
And so we need to reach out to the <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/" target="_blank">crowd to fund the film </a>through donations. So far 262 people have donated to the project. That’s great, but it’s not a crowd. It’s a large house party maybe, and we love everyone of them, but it’s not a crowd. We need to add a 0 to that number, or even two 0’s. Then we’d have the crowd that we need.<br />
<span><br />
Part of the problem is that people are very unaccustomed to this kind of relationship with a film. Films are something which get made and then offered to you to select which one you’d like to pay to see. You make your selection, hand over your dosh, and like it or lump it. Or we pay with our license fee, or by watching ads. But still it is a fare on offer, to consume or not. We are used to this, we know this way. But we are not used to being given the chance to participate in deciding what gets made to begin with, audiences are not accustomed to being in the seat of the commissioning editor or grant maker.  With <em>Just Do It</em>, we are asking people to shift from the role of consumer, to that of philanthropist.  We need a smallish crowd to support us to make this film, so that we can then give it to a much larger crowds when it’s done. People are not buying something for themselves, they are helping something to exists for the greater good.<br />
<span><br />
I am confident that we will finish the film, one way or another, and that is because of all of the people who are helping to make that a certainty, but it is also a leap of faith. I began this process not knowing where it would take me, and along the way I’ve met literally hundreds of amazing, generous, active, and committed people. The sorts of people who want to see a better world, and are prepared to put their time and their energy where it matters. These people have given me the faith to embrace this ‘wilfully optimistic’ business model, and be the change I want to see.<br />
<span><br />
So I end with a thank you to everyone who has helped so far to make this film happen, and to all those who will help before we are done.  We literally could not have done it without you.<br />
<span><br />
<em>To find out more about Emily’s current project – Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world check out the website – <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk</a>. Emily has been guest blogging about the project here at Shooting People over the last couple of weeks to coincide with 20 days of match funding from Lush (the soap people). During this period, all donations to the project will be matched, pound for pound, but Lush Cosmetics, so go on over and make a donation – </em><em><a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days</a> There&#8217;s only 4 more days to go!</em><br />
</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/together-we-are-stronger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Crowd Funding</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filmmaker Emily James discusses why she’s choosing to fund her next film, Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world - a feature documentary about climate activists, using crowd funding by donation. So, if one’s publishing under a Creative Commons license (see previous blog), and not charging for viewing the work, how can one raise the funding to make it? In the long term, I don’t know what the big solution is. But it’s clear that big<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><br />
<em>Filmmaker <a href="http://www.emily-james.com" target="_blank">Emily James</a></em><em> discusses why she’s choosing to fund her next film, <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk" target="_blank">Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world </a></em><em>- a feature documentary about climate activists, using crowd funding by donation.</em><br />
<span><br />
So, if one’s publishing under a Creative Commons license (<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/" target="_blank">see previous blog</a>), and not charging for viewing the work, how can one raise the funding to make it? In the long term, I don’t know what the big solution is. But it’s clear that big changes are coming, and I’d like to see us aiming in a direction that empowers the widest number of people to participate in the decisions about what gets made and what gets seen. And ideally to finance production of creative work without reliance on advertising, brands, or commercial investment, because all of these distort and warp the creative process in a socially unproductive manner.<br />
<span><br />
<a href="http://just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-520" title="Help fund this film" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/fund_btn.png" alt="" width="203" height="53" /></a>In the short term, the solution that we’ve come up with for <em>Just Do It</em> is Crowd Funding. Crowd Funding is a relatively new idea that’s gaining lots of steam.  The basic model is that a core group of supports – anywhere from 300 to 30,000 – each contribute a small amount towards the cost of production. In some cases, such as <em>The Age of Stupid</em>, this was an ‘investment’ and the person owned a piece of the film. However taking investments means you need to recoup, which means you’ll have to charge people to see it.  So with <em>Just Do It</em>, we’re looking for a greater number of people to give smaller amounts, but to give them as donations rather than investments.  If people want to think of it as ‘pre-buying’ the film, they can. They will also get other little perks too.  However we prefer to think of it as being supported by them as artists to make something great to share with the world, rather than simply selling them something we’ve made for their consumption. But that’s just us.<br />
<span><br />
What’s important to us is that we have the freedom to pursue making the film without having to be concerned over it making back lots of money when it’s done. I don’t want to be making creative decisions about the film and thinking ‘what will sell better?’ or ‘which way is more likely to attract a sales agent?’. It just might be that the <em>best</em> film to make with <em>Just Do It</em> &#8211; the one which has the story best and is truest to the subject &#8211; might not <em>be</em> the one which would gain the most commercial success, but it’s the film that we’re determined to make.<br />
<span><br />
And we believe that there are a lot of other people out there who would like to see our version &#8211; the version that isn’t constrained by Broadcaster editorial departments, or investors’ legal concerns. There must be at least 30,000 people out there who’d like to see this film. I’m certain of that, it’s really not a very big number. And if each of them makes a donation, we’re golden.  Alternatively, in the ‘commercial market’, if you want to raise the budget for a feature doc, you’ve got to be able to convince financiers that it will get an audience in the multi-millions.  This is in part because only about 10% of the money that people pay to watch the film ever get’s back to the producers (and that’s if they’re lucky, often it’s less!). They’ve got to get a lot of bums on seats to cover the rest of the machine. We’ve just got to gather a small crowd to support us directly.<br />
<span><br />
Like crowd sourcing, or micro-investment, the idea is to harness the power of a crowd of people who want to see this film get made. Already a small crowd of over 100 people have given generously of their time to work on the film.  And we hope that a crowd of donors will now come to help fund it.<br />
<span><br />
Now, this next part may seem like a leap, but I think that ultimately some form of ‘crowd funding’ is the antidote to advertising. Advertising is one of the most insidious evils of our time.  It warps our brains and drives our psychotic consumption.  We think that advertising allows us to watch things ‘for free’, but we forget to factor in the real price that we are paying. As we grope our way forward into the new media world, and figure out what the new financial models will be, I’m hoping that we can collectively resist the trend towards branded content and private ad revenue, and rather aim for something much more similar to the Licence Fee, or its not so distant cousin, the subscription model. HBO is a very good contemporary example of how the subscription model allows for much greater creative risk taking, and as a result, much stronger and inventive program making. The BBC and HBO are arguably the two best and biggest tent-poles proping up the creativity and value to viewers across the whole of contemporary TV, and both are financed in a way that gives them independence from advertising or sponsorship. Let us remember this as we work out where we are going.<br />
<span><br />
<em>To find out more about Emily’s current project &#8211; Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world check out the website – <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk</a>. Emily will be guest blogging about the project here at Shooting People over the next couple of weeks to coincide with 20 days of match funding from Lush (the soap people). During this period, all donations to the project will be matched, pound for pound, but Lush Cosmetics, so go on over and make a donation &#8211; </em><em><a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days</a></em><br />
<span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Creative Commons</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Becky Hogge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filmmaker <a href="http://www.emily-james.com" target="_blank">Emily James</a> discusses why she’s choosing to release her next film,<a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk" target="_blank"> <em>Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world </em></a>- a feature documentary about climate activists, under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">Creative Commons licence</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span> </span><br />
Filmmaker <a href="http://www.emily-james.com" target="_blank">Emily James</a> discusses why she’s choosing to release her next film,<a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk" target="_blank"> <em>Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world </em></a>- a feature documentary about climate activists, under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">Creative Commons licence</a>.<br />
<span> </span><br />
<a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-515" title="Just Do It" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/mail-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>For me, publishing <em>Just Do It </em>under a Creative Commons licence – free to watch, free to share &#8211; is about a wilful rejection of the economic model that binds current creative work (and in this case filmmaking). Making films is expensive and so it’s unsurprising that it has become more an industry than an art. What is more, the decisions about what gets made (and what doesn’t) have been largely privatised and are now driven almost entirely by commercial concerns (even if that commercial concern is simply getting enough ‘market share’). I’d like to see more space for films (and other work) to be judged on different merits than just box office takings.  This may sound naïve, but ‘naïve’ suggests that I don’t understand how ‘the real world works’. Actually,  I understand all too well how this world currently works – I just don’t like it, and I think it could be different.<br />
<span> </span><br />
The concept of a creative commons, where ideas can be shared freely, with everyone contributing openly to a shared conversation, without copyright restriction or commercial interests appeals to me at a basic level. Imagine the rich diversity of expression, the breadth of available entertainment, and the level of participation and cross-pollination.  Of course, in the utterly capitalist world that we currently live in, it seems almost absurdly idealistic, and I might as well be dancing around with fairies in my tie-died hair.  But then, at the same time, developments in Open Source and Free Culture practice make it feel like it really could be just over the next horizon, if only we chose to go that way.  So choosing to publish under a Creative Commons licence is for me an act of faith and an attempt to push in the right direction.  [for a further and better elaboration on the importance of Creative Commons, check out <a href="http://barefoottechie.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/help-raise-20k-in-20-days-for-just-do-it-an-exciting-new-cc-film-about-climate-change-activism/" target="_blank">this blog about </a><em><a href="http://barefoottechie.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/help-raise-20k-in-20-days-for-just-do-it-an-exciting-new-cc-film-about-climate-change-activism/" target="_blank">Just Do It </a></em><a href="http://barefoottechie.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/help-raise-20k-in-20-days-for-just-do-it-an-exciting-new-cc-film-about-climate-change-activism/" target="_blank">from Becky Hogge</a>, expert on Open Rights, and friend of the project]<br />
<span> </span><br />
In the case of <em>Just Do It</em>, I had a further reason for wanting to avoid a commercial model: I really did not want to exploit the people who were in the film.  I use the word ‘exploit’ here in a literal sense, not an overly emotive one, but both apply.<br />
<span> </span><br />
If I had followed the standard, contemporary funding model for a film such as this, I would be investing my time into a product, getting some pre-sale (the equivalent of an ‘advance’) from distributors and sales agents, maybe some private investment too, and then planning to pull in earnings from DVD and TV sales.  Now, to be clear, very few projects on this model ever go into profit, and the vast majority don’t even manage to cover the initial ‘investments’- particularly that of the filmmakers time. Filmmakers are passionate about their projects, and so often engage in a form of ‘auto-exploitation’ in order to get them made. Often they justify this to themselves on the ground that they will own the finished film, and so, when it’s a success (as they must believe it will be!), they will be financially rewarded. The sad truth is that time after time we see that even rather successful films still don’t ever pull in enough to adequately compensate the heavy investment of time and energy. So it’s not a particularly successful model, but it’s a pretty dominant one and it’s the way that most independent filmmakers find themselves having to work.<br />
<span> </span><br />
But with <em>Just Do It</em>, I simply did not want to make a film about these activists which I would then own as an asset and would have to then exploit to recoup my investment.  That’s not the relationship that I want to have with this film, with my contributors, with the many other people working on the film, nor with my audience.  It felt inappropriate, and out of step with the themes and content of the film. So <em>Just Do It</em> seemed like the perfect film for the sort of Creative Commons experiment that I’d been wanting to do for some while. In so doing, I could attempt to focus on the film creating real culture-shift, rather than on making something that would be a commercial success.<br />
<span> </span><br />
Again, I’m aware of how naïve some will think this sounds, but that’s only because this set of commercial and exploitative relationships have become so ingrained in our culture, that we can’t see beyond them.  Making ‘good business sense’ has become the yard stick by which we measure every plan, and this failure of imagination &#8211; this acceptance that markets and balance sheets should rule every part of our lives – must be vigorously resisted, particularly when it comes to our creative and social spaces.<br />
<span> </span><br />
So we need to start exploring new models and pushing at the boundaries of this box that we’re in as hard as we can.  As with everything in life, if we passively accept the status-quo, we’ve got little hope for a better future. The fast moving world of communication technologies is quickly undermining the old Copyright models, and by participating in the Creative Commons and Copy-left movement, I hope that we can be part of building a new model which is less about control and ownership and more about freedom, sharing, and collaboration.<br />
<span> </span><br />
<em> To find out more about Emily’s current project &#8211; Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world check out the website – <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk</a>. Emily will be guest blogging about the project here at Shooting People over the next couple of weeks to coincide with 20 days of match funding from Lush (the soap people). During this period, all donations to the project will be matched, pound for pound, but Lush Cosmetics, so go on over and make a donation</em>. &#8211; <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days</a><br />
<span> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I said ‘no’ to the Broadcasters.</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-i-said-%e2%80%98no%e2%80%99-to-the-broadcasters/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-i-said-%e2%80%98no%e2%80%99-to-the-broadcasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest blogger, Emily James, is currently in production on a feature documentary about environmental direct action groups, including Plane Stupid, Climate Camp, and Climate Rush. The film is crowd funding, and will be released under a Creative Commons license in early 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span> </span><br />
<em>Guest blogger, Emily James, is currently in production on a feature documentary about environmental direct action groups, including Plane Stupid, Climate Camp, and Climate Rush. The film is crowd funded, and will be released under a Creative Commons license in early 2011.</em><br />
<span> </span><br />
<span> </span><br />
<img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-471" title="emily-james" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/emily-james-1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />Getting a TV broadcast commission has its pros and cons. On the upside, you’ve got the money to make your film and a relatively guaranteed audience. On the down side you lose editorial, stylistic, and production control, and from the filmmaker’s point of view, the compromises can often be difficult to swallow.<br />
<span> </span><br />
I’ve made plenty of films for TV, for a variety of broadcasters, and I’ve learned the game. I went to talk to a few of them when I first started filming for what would become <em><a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">Just Do It</a></em>, but I quickly realised that on this one, I wasn’t prepared to compromise.<br />
<span> </span><br />
Why not? Well, a few reasons:<br />
<span> </span><br />
Firstly, it had taken a great deal of time and effort to gain the trust of the activists whom I was filming, and I didn’t want to sell out that trust either by framing their story in the style of storytelling which passes for ‘objectivity’ at the moment, or in a way which broadcasters and commissioning editors believe ‘audiences will come to’. I realised that I believed in what the activists were doing, and I wasn’t going to pretend differently.<br />
<span> </span><br />
Secondly, I wanted to pursue my vision for the film, and to have the freedom to make what I believed could be an important and significant social contribution I believed that there was an audience for a film which playfully and cheekily championed the cause of direct action, and that with the privileged access which I had, I could make a unique film which did not fit easily into TV boxes, but would be all the more exciting for it. The film I had in mind might not attract 2.3 million TV viewers at 9pm on a Thursday (though to be honest, I think it would if given the chance), but I genuinely believed that internationally, there was most certainly a large audience who would come to it.  I wanted the film to be able to find that audience over time, rather than shot-gunned out in one splurge on TV and then never seen again.<br />
<span> </span><br />
Thirdly, this film was going to be a legal minefield. *sigh* As Marina (one of our main characters) often says, “frankly, the law is an ass”. Broadcasters have to be careful. They have their licenses and deep pockets to protect. I’ve had my fair share of forced changes to shows in order to get the stamp of approval from the legal department, and I’ve witnessed a shed load more. I knew that I would want to take risks with this film: I would want to name names, and let my characters state their case against the targets of their direct action. If I self-published, the risks would be mine to take.<br />
<span> </span><br />
And finally, I wanted to go all-out and pursue a bold vision for the entire project – not just on screen, but off – and make it a forward looking experiment in Creative Commons, crowd funding, and bespoke distribution.  A film which was about people coming together to work towards a progressive vision of the future seemed like the perfect place to test out these new ideas.<br />
<span> </span><br />
With the production of <em>Just Do It</em> we are attempting to re-imagine the relationship between audience and producers, shifting audiences from being passive consumers to active participants and decision makers. It’s an attempt to help carve a path from our current world of commodification and commercialisation towards one of creative production and free communications of ideas. Idealistic? Yes indeed.<br />
<span> </span><br />
<em>To find out more about Emily’s current project &#8211; Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world check out the website – <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk</a>. Emily will be guest blogging about the project here at Shooting People over the next couple of weeks. Starting tomorrow, and for 20 days, all donations to the project will be matched, pound for pound, but Lush Cosmetics, so go on over and make a donation.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-i-said-%e2%80%98no%e2%80%99-to-the-broadcasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shooter Films: Interview with the Directors of American: The Bill Hicks Story</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/05/shooter-films-interview-with-the-directors-of-american-the-bill-hicks-story/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/05/shooter-films-interview-with-the-directors-of-american-the-bill-hicks-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>helen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Festivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American: The Bill Hicks Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shooters Matt Harlock and Paul Thomas will soon be seeing their feature documentary American: The Bill Hicks Story opening in UK cinemas on 14 May. Four years in the making, American pushes documentary storytelling in a new direction, using a stunning new animation technique to tell the amazing life story of the iconoclastic comedian and his struggle to get his voice heard. For the uninitiated, here’s a brief background of who Bill was and the story the film seeks to<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/05/shooter-films-interview-with-the-directors-of-american-the-bill-hicks-story/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GaUvt81gH9c&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GaUvt81gH9c&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Shooters <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/cards/matt_halflife">Matt Harlock</a> and <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/cards/paulthomas3">Paul Thomas</a> will soon be seeing their feature documentary <em>American: The Bill Hicks Story</em> opening in UK cinemas on 14 May. Four years in the making, <em>American </em>pushes documentary storytelling in a new direction, using a stunning new animation technique to tell the amazing life story of the iconoclastic comedian and his struggle to get his voice heard.</p>
<p><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Sundance_crop.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-181" title="Sundance_crop" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Sundance_crop-300x209.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="209" /></a></p>
<p>For the uninitiated, here’s a brief background of who Bill was and the story the film seeks to tell&#8230;</p>
<p>Bill Hicks is considered by many to be the best comedian of the modern era – ironic given his anonymity in his native America. He was described by many names – philosopher, social satirist, even preacher, but he was ultimately a comic who believed that he could save his audience by confronting them with the truth. He began performing at the age of thirteen, developing a unique comedy style that turned convention on it&#8217;s head, wrong footing audiences and opening up new ways of thinking. Bill&#8217;s comedy challenged the injustices of life head on but his uncompromising approach met with conflict in America and it was instead on the international stage where he found fame. In 1993, on the verge of wider success, Bill fell ill with terminal cancer, but his timeless comedy has lived on and still resonates today with ever growing numbers of people around the world, securing his place as one of America&#8217;s greatest cultural heroes.</p>
<p><strong><br />
SP: So how did the project come about?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Matt: </strong>Although this is our first feature, Paul had been making TV comedy and entertainment shows for many years, and I had been making drama for British TV and developing feature scripts. We’d both been looking to do something a bit more substantial and meaningful when this project came along.</p>
<p><strong>SP: What prompted the idea for your film and how did it evolve?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Paul:</strong> Bill Hicks is already a huge American cultural icon in the UK, Canada, Australia and around the world, but had never seen that recognition in the States because the free thinking nature of his material challenged institutions and accepted ways of thinking.</p>
<p>Matt had done a London tribute night for Bill, and as well as uncovering some rare and unseen footage, had got to know the Hicks family. It was at that point that we realised that the amazing life story of this groundbreaking comedian had never fully been told. Using my TV background, we began formulating ways to tell Bill’s story.</p>
<p><strong>SP: What were your biggest challenges in developing the project?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Matt:</strong> Bill’s family and friends had never all spoken to one team before, and the initial challenge was in convincing them that we were trustworthy enough to take on the huge responsibility of telling Bill&#8217;s story. Gradually they all realised that this emotional journey was an important historical document that would become part of the cultural timeline of comedy.</p>
<p><strong>SP: What was the atmosphere like whilst recording these interviews?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Paul: </strong>Each interview lasted several days and to make the interviewees as comfortable as possible we visited everyone in their own homes and filmed with minimal lighting set ups and no additional crew. This gave us flexibility and a relaxed intimacy in taking each interviewee back through emotional memories at their own pace.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dS0JIZQojWY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dS0JIZQojWY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>SP: Did you learn anything about Hicks that surprised you or that you hadn&#8217;t appreciated before you started making the film?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Paul: </strong>What emerged was a vivid new telling of Bill’s story as the interviewees recalled his life’s journey with astonishing clarity. Over two months we shot 120 hours of interviews and uncovered over 1,300 unseen photographs. It was clear the same process wouldn’t happen again and that this would be the last chance to create a definitive historical record of Bill’s life and story.</p>
<p><strong>SP: In what state was the archive material of Bill’s performances?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Matt: </strong>Ah – the infamous rare footage which Hicks’ fans always knew in their hearts existed but until now had never seen. Stored in Mary’s antique glass fronted cabinet was Bill’s own collection of VHS tapes of his performances dating back to 1980, some of which had never been played before. Most were filmed by the clubs and then later by his brother Steve – they represented Bill’s life’s’ work. There were some heart-stopping moments as the tapes, some over 25 years old, made high pitched squeals as they rewound through the VHS player. A snapped tape would be a punch-line lost forever. Thankfully Bill’s work is now all safely digitised to ensure its longevity.</p>
<p><strong>SP: Can you talk a bit about your unique approach to using animation in the film?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Paul: </strong>As Bill’s story was so unique, the challenge was in finding an interesting and innovative way to tell it. We knew there was a huge archive of photos of Bill and so the idea of an animated photographic storytelling approach arose, eschewing talking heads and allowing the viewer to be fully immersed into the world of the characters, much closer in form to a narrative method. Little did we know that this choice would take our every spare penny and waking moment over the next 4 years of our lives!</p>
<p><strong>Matt: </strong>It&#8217;s hopefully pushing documentary storytelling in a new direction &#8211; recreating the key unseen scenes of Bill’s life and for the first time reveal the worlds that shaped his character and his comedy. Real locations such as the bedroom window he snuck out of to perform, the dark alleys of Houston where he nearly met his end, and the spellbinding theatre auditoriums where he played his most famous concerts are all meticulously recreated in stunning three dimensional photorealism to provide a fresh new sense of the challenges Bill faced, creating a real sense of what his journey was like.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FJY4OMljR5U&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FJY4OMljR5U&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>Paul: </strong>In this scene, when Bill is a teenager and wasn’t allowed to go down to a local comedy club, he and his friends decided to sneak out. With a talking heads documentary what you’d see is people in their late forties/early fifties describing this scene when they were kids. Instead, what you can do is photograph the original family film and photos from Bill at school and superimpose him into the scenes along with his friends so that you can take an audience back there. It’s a totally, totally different experience. You’re inside a narrative story just like a dramatic film so it doesn’t feel like being in a documentary.</p>
<p><strong>SP: Why do you think audiences will enjoy/take to the film?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Matt:</strong> Bill’s story is fascinating because it describes a life lived with meaning. Bill was &#8211; and still is &#8211; incredibly attractive to people because we&#8217;re all looking for meaning in our lives and Bill was clearly someone who had found his purpose, his reason for being here. And he lived that life against considerable struggles, with purpose and heart. Above all though, his is the human story of an artist who had to overcome great obstacles, personal and professional, to try and make the world a better place. As such, this story is for everyone.</p>
<p><strong>SP: What have the reactions been like so far?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Paul: </strong>The reactions at the ten festivals we have played so far (London, Sheffield Doc/Fest, Glasgow, True/False, SxSW, Dallas, Houston, Dublin, Boston and now HotDocs) have been amazing. London Film Festival was where we found out that the film worked with an audience and many people were in tears at the end. There was even a standing ovation!</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TzpUXIF6kYA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TzpUXIF6kYA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong>Matt: </strong>Then taking the film to America was the next big step because in many ways it was the reason the film was made. Bill never reached a mainstream US audience in his lifetime and we saw the role of the film as an attempt to carry on where Bill left off,  trying to get his message out to people in the States and worldwide. SxSW in Austin has a big Bill following and we filled the 1,200 seat Paramount Theater twice!</p>
<p><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bh4-2.jpg"><img title="bh4-2" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bh4-2-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bh8-22.jpg"><img title="bh8-2" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bh8-22-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/bh8-22.jpg"></a>But it was rather scary sitting in an audience of Americans as Bill rails at them for what&#8217;s wrong with their country! Luckily, Bill attracts the kind of audiences who are open to discussion on big issues – and of course, dick jokes.</p>
<p><strong>SP: What are your future projects in the pipeline?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Matt:</strong> We have several projects in development but we still have plenty to do to finish this one first, including preparing for our theatrical release in the UK in May and the DVD release in September – there are lots of extras, it will be a great package of material for Bill fans and film fans.</p>
<p><strong>Paul: </strong>Completing this project also requires getting the film out to an American audience, giving Bill his rightful place in the culture through this truly archetypal American story &#8211; a challenging examination of free speech and what it means to be American.</p>
<p>AMERICAN is released nationwide on May 14th. For more information on the film, to see venues and buy tickets,<br />
please visit <a class="aligncenter" title="American official site" href="http://www.americanthemovie.com" target="_blank">http://www.americanthemovie.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/05/shooter-films-interview-with-the-directors-of-american-the-bill-hicks-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday at True/False</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2009/02/friday-at-truefalse/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2009/02/friday-at-truefalse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ingrid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Festivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From The Hip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sounds Like Teen Spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True/False]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/category/fromthehip/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The March March parade up Broadway makes everyone smile. I was talking to someone about it afterwards and she said how nice it was to see grown-ups jumping up and down and grinning inanely and what an incredible sense of community an anarchic parade like this creates. Amen! Here&#8217;s the evidence. This fine lady was giving out buttons that said I AM LOVED in lots of different languages Esther Robinson (a Swami here this year), with Sky Sitney (Silverdocs) Stephanie<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2009/02/friday-at-truefalse/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The March March parade up Broadway makes everyone smile. I was talking to someone about it afterwards and she said how nice it was to see grown-ups jumping up and down and grinning inanely and what an incredible sense of community an anarchic parade like this creates. Amen! Here&#8217;s the evidence.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-851" title="img_0970" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/img_0970.jpg" alt="" width="375" height="500" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-855" title="img_0977" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/img_0977.jpg" alt="" width="375" height="500" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-856" title="img_0978" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/img_0978.jpg" alt="" width="375" height="500" /></p>
<p>This fine lady was giving out buttons that said I AM LOVED in lots of different languages</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-853" title="img_0973" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/img_0973.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>Esther Robinson (a Swami here this year), with Sky Sitney (Silverdocs)</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-852" title="img_0972" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/img_0972.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>Stephanie Skaff, AJ Schnack, Mark Rosenberg (Rooftop Films) and David Wilson (True/False &#8211; whoo hoo!!!) &#8211; apologies to all for my over-enthusiastic flash</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-854" title="img_0974" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/img_0974.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>Natalie Difford (Chicken &amp; Egg), Brent Hoff (Wholphin), and me</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-857" title="img_0980" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/img_0980.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>The legendary Exene Cervenka busks before <em>Sounds Like Teen Spirit</em> (I was too awestruck to get close enough to take a proper picture)</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-858" title="img_0982" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/img_0982.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>Me, Jess Search (BRITDOC) and Jamie Jay Johnson after Jamie&#8217;s packed screening of<em> Sounds Like Teen Spirit</em>. I&#8217;m utterly biased but I enjoyed the screening immensely and I think everyone else did too. Hooray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2009/02/friday-at-truefalse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cinema Eye 2009 Shortlist</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2009/01/cinema-eye-2009-shortlist/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2009/01/cinema-eye-2009-shortlist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ingrid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From The Hip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJ Schnack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinema Eye Honors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thom Powers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/category/fromthehip/?p=756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awards are a bit like weddings. You sort of wish that everyone would just get together and throw a party and pay attention to each other just because it&#8217;s a nice thing to do but you really have to add a little something extra into the mix to get people to rent hotel rooms and buy toasters and china and, well, I guess my point is that sometimes, although the competition aspect of film award events doesn&#8217;t sit so well<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2009/01/cinema-eye-2009-shortlist/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awards are a bit like weddings. You sort of wish that everyone would just get together and throw a party and pay attention to each other just because it&#8217;s a nice thing to do but you really have to add a little something extra into the mix to get people to rent hotel rooms and buy toasters and china and, well, I guess my point is that sometimes, although the competition aspect of film award events doesn&#8217;t sit so well with me, it is a great way to draw attention to films and filmmakers. And the <a href="http://cinemaeyehonors.com" target="_blank">Cinema Eye Honors</a>, celebrating their second year in 2009, are a breath of fresh air in the awards world, drawing attention to the full scope of documentary filmmaking practice and to all aspects of the craft.</p>
<p>Final nominations will be announced on January 19th in Park City during Sundance. The shortlist is as follows:</p>
<p>AMERICAN TEEN &#8211; Nanette Burstein, dir<br />
THE BETRAYAL (NERAKHOON) &#8211; Ellen Kuras &amp; Thavisouk Phrasavath, dir<br />
ENCOUNTERS AT THE END OF THE WORLD – Werner Herzog, dir<br />
THE ENGLISH SURGEON – Geoffrey Smith, dir<br />
FORBIDDEN LIES – Anna Broinowski, dir<br />
IN A DREAM – Jeremiah Zagar, dir<br />
MAN ON WIRE – James Marsh, dir<br />
MY WINNIPEG – Guy Maddin, dir<br />
THE ORDER OF MYTHS – Margaret Brown, dir<br />
ROMAN POLANSKI: WANTED AND DESIRED – Marina Zenovich, dir<br />
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE – Errol Morris, dir<br />
STRANDED, I COME FROM A PLANE THAT CRASHED ON THE MOUNTAINS – Gonzalo Arijon, dir<br />
TROUBLE THE WATER – Carl Deal &amp; Tia Lessin, dir<br />
UP THE YANGTZE – Yung Chang, dir<br />
WALTZ WITH BASHIR – Ari Folman, dir</p>
<p>The Cinema Eye Nominations Committee was comprised of 15 of the top festival programmers of nonfiction films.  This year’s committee members are:</p>
<p>Meira Blaustein, Woodstock Film Festival<br />
Phoebe Brush, Full Frame Film Festival<br />
David Courier, Sundance Film Festival<br />
Heather Croall, Sheffield Doc/Fest<br />
Sean Farnel, Hot Docs<br />
Tine Fischer, CPH:DOX (Copenhagen)<br />
Tom Hall, Sarasota Film Festival<br />
David Kwok, Tribeca Film Festival<br />
David Nugent, Hamptons Film Festival<br />
Janet Pierson, SXSW Film Festival<br />
Thom Powers, Toronto International Film Festival<br />
Rachel Rosen, LA Film Festival<br />
Sky Sitney, AFI Silverdocs<br />
David Wilson, True/False Film Festival<br />
Brit Withey, Denver Film Festival</p>
<p>Congrats to all the shortlisted filmmakers and to AJ Schnack and Thom Powers and everyone else involved in Cinema Eye for doing such sterling work for documentaries. You are probably already familiar with Schack&#8217;s <a href="http://edendale.typepad.com/weblog/" target="_blank">All These Wonderful Things blog</a> but Powers has a great new-ish blog for<a href="http://stfdocs.com" target="_blank"> Stranger Than Fiction</a> so subscribe to it today! The Winter Season of STF runs from January 13th till March 1st at NYC&#8217;s IFC Center, and it kicks off on Tuesday with Ben Kempas&#8217; <em>Upstream Battle</em>. See you there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2009/01/cinema-eye-2009-shortlist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

