<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shooting People &#187; Shooting People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/tag/shooting-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog</link>
	<description>Shooting People : Independent Filmmakers Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Future Artists article : Activism and new UK Film: How The Underground Recreated The Hero</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2012/05/future-artists-article-activism-and-new-uk-film-how-the-underground-recreated-the-hero/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2012/05/future-artists-article-activism-and-new-uk-film-how-the-underground-recreated-the-hero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markashmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Filmmaking & Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools Of The 21st Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arts funding row]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branchage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRITDOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cath Le Couteur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Of The Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hallo Panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Weiler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SXSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True/False]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UKFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=3751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Activism and new UK Film: How The Underground Recreated The Hero : Written By Jane Mcconnell &#160; &#160; Jane McConnell @janemcconnell  and @futureartists May 8th 2012, Salford, UK &#160; In Emily James’ Just Do It, we watch news packages from major news outlets interlaced with POV footage from protestors scaling the giant cooler chimneys at the Ratcliffe Power Station. For a UK audience, a film like Just Do It is particularly subversive – even controversial. The protests were decade-defining – it<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2012/05/future-artists-article-activism-and-new-uk-film-how-the-underground-recreated-the-hero/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Activism and new UK Film: How The Underground Recreated The Hero : Written By Jane Mcconnell</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.projectlostgeneration.co.uk" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3754" title="the lost generation" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/IMG_5172_00000bw-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Jane McConnell <a href="http://www.twitter.com/janemcconnell" target="_blank">@janemcconnell </a> and <a href="http://www.twitter.com/futureartists" target="_blank">@futureartists</a></p>
<p>May 8th 2012, Salford, UK</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In Emily James’ <em><a href="http://justdoitfilm.com/" target="_blank">Just Do It</a></em>, we watch news packages from major news outlets interlaced with POV footage from protestors scaling the giant cooler chimneys at the Ratcliffe Power Station. For a UK audience, a film like <em>Just Do It</em> is particularly subversive – even controversial. The protests were decade-defining – it was the first time we saw a domestic conflict of interests play out in new and old media – with audiences truly divided. Were the news outlets biased? Who’s the hero, who’s the villain? And crucially, did we agree?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>As any filmmaker will know, this is when it’s time to make a documentary.<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Just Do It. <a href="http://www.invisiblecircusfilm.com" target="_blank">No Dress Rehearsal</a>. </strong>And here’s some titles from more shorts and features: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fBwpGTBAzw" target="_blank">Your State of Emergency</a>. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/mar/31/young-hearts-run-free-review" target="_blank">Young Hearts Run Free</a>. <a href="http://www.sounditoutdoc.com/" target="_blank">Sound It Out.</a></p>
<p>Every title has an urgency – each stamping a precedent, a protest; striving and independence.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Or, if that’s a bit too high-flown, maybe at there’s at least a deliberate link between the present tense and activism. In the US, it’s caught the attention of the Academy this year via Marshall Curry’s brave documentary ‘<a href="http://www.ifatreefallsfilm.com/" target="_blank">If A Tree Falls’.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And in the UK (through crowdfunding and hey – the rather traditional own-funding,) the entire scene has found itself leaning towards political realism for reasons that affect our lives in the most obvious ways. With documentary and documentary-drama (see: <a href="http://www.jasonwingard.co.uk/" target="_blank">Jason Wingard’s ‘Louise</a>’ (2010) for example) taking precedent in screenings across the UK’s major cities every single month, are directors losing sight of fiction film as a vehicle for change? Are audiences no longer wanting escapist routes from which heroes soar?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Or, are directors, amid government-enforced arts cuts and increased taxes discovering that the only way to tell the story about <em>any</em> modern hero, is to tell the tales that are closest to home?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Case Study 1– Just Do It: A Tale of Modern-Day Outlaws (2010)</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/emily_james.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3752" title="emily_james" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/emily_james-297x300.jpg" alt="" width="297" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In Emily James’ <em>Just Do It</em>, we’re invited merrily into a world of social discord and disenfranchisement with capitalism. Emily James’ captures this in her film, following our 6 activist heroes-of-the-story as they protest with campaign groups Climate Camp, Plane Stupid, and finally to the headline stealing Ratcliffe Power Station protest – as well as featuring unflinching footage from the Copenhagen Summit in 2009.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The film’s tone is more exuberant than darkly political, and avoids the pitfalls of being overly solemn or weighty. A good thing really, when the typical representation of protestors in the mainstream media is one of violent ‘extremists’. A bright soundtrack, which provides the backdrop for friendly narration, animations, maps and crucially – unedited details on the nuts and bolts of staging a protest – are all freely portrayed in the film. Just Do It follows James, Lily, Sophie, Marina and we even get a glimpse of Emily – as they resist arrest, blockade the Royal Bank of Scotland and take action. Perhaps in this case, the heroes of the story have been saved from anti-hero ‘terrorist’ status – and are real people.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Case Study 2 – Invisible Circus: No Dress Rehearsal</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ICNDH_quad_LORES-670x441.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3753" title="invisible circus no dress rehearsal film" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ICNDH_quad_LORES-670x441-300x197.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="197" /></a></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><em>Invisible Circus: No Dress Rehearsal</em> by Naomi Smyth, documents a four-year labour of love and subversive artsquat and performance group that take over abandoned properties across Bristol – a city renowned for street art, and unfortunately for the group, large property developers. The hero of the tale is Doug Francis, the assumed lead of the circus – even though he would probably deny such a title. (Eitherway, he is the go-to man throughout the feature.)  The documentary movie tells an underdog story of guerilla art performers; a collective of travelling performers who turn something empty and abandoned, into a work of circus and burlesque art. There’s footage of audiences queuing around the block who heard from each other via text or word about an underground show – as well as messy footage of the stars of the show fighting city councils, landlords – and putting in hard graft to reclaim derelict, dirty spaces and transform them in the name of art for all. We learn that during Naomi’s four year journey – her role moves form being the documentarian, to being part of an art movement.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>WATCH THE FULL FILM FOR FREE HERE VIA DAILYMOTION</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/xqerrq" frameborder="0" width="480" height="270"></iframe><br />
<a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xqerrq_invisible-circus-no-dress-rehearsal-www-invisiblecircusfilm-com_shortfilms" target="_blank">Invisible Circus: No Dress Rehearsal &#8211; www&#8230;</a> <em>by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/futureartists" target="_blank">futureartists</a></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Are the Directors Heroes? Battling to get distribution</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The ultimate struggle, it can be argued, for any filmmaker is getting people to care about the premieres are over. <em>&#8230;No Dress Rehearsal’ </em>has managed it – through decidedly independent means: pubs, pop-up venues and indie cinemas. This year, the film is crossing the pond to San Francisco – it’s just won the 2012 award for best film with a New York-based online distribution site, Dynamo. After laying low for a couple of years following it’s release, the film is now reaching brand new audiences throughout the world, working with the UK’s only independent film distributor, <a href="http://www.futureartists.co.uk" target="_blank">Future Artists</a>. Interestingly enough, the distribution of <em>Just Do It</em> followed an equally subversive model. Screened in its near-complete state at Sheffield Documentary Festival in 2010, Emily James made the call for more funds to complete the movie. Then, after some serious crowdfunding, the film premiered, complete, at the following 2011 festival – to a standing ovation. It’s now screened all over the world, at pop-up venues, artsquat venues, indie cinemas and festivals. It even had it’s own “Recycled Red Carpet” event inside a reclaimed building.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Looking at the film this way, perhaps hero of these stories is the film director – actively promoting a film, irrespective of numerous failed bids to the now defunct UK Film Council thanks to a stream of extremely conservative public funding cuts made over the last two years.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>We Could Be Heroes?</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Recessions and credit crunches, it is often said, creates a surge in entrepreneurialism. Parallel to this, a cultural backlash to lower arts-funding in essence, leads to a stronger independent film scene. And weirdly, each film represents this as an entity.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Yet their appeal extends beyond the often tragic and serious narrative lines that often provide the blueprint for documentary film. The UK’s current trend for social realism has, whether deliberately or not, leaned towards that all-too-familiar hero’s narrative. Albeit, each film provides a rickety, handheld, yet proudly alternative (with a capital Alterative) story arc. There is an insatiable urge created within the audience of these films to wonder where the films’ thundering courses of action will lead to. But these courses of action are only set in motion as a reaction following, we believe, oppression by an assumed authority figure. In <em>Just Do It</em>, it is bankers and the police. In <em>Sound it Out</em> (2011, Jeanie Findlay), it’s the major record stores. In <em>Your State of Emergency</em> (2009, Mark Ashmore), it is the police and in <em>&#8230;No Dress Rehearsal</em>, it’s bulging property developers and arguably old-fashioned land laws that are guilty of perverting the course of our heroes.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>A theme which links three of these films together, however, is the fear of a police state. In <em>Just Do It</em>, there is one rather revealing moment in which the UK’s sensitivity of an increased ‘police state’ shows the group not only turn their phones off – but take their batteries and SIM cards out their mobile phones to ensure they’re not tapped. The film makes every effort to show that protestors are, after all, human and subject to the same policing threat as any non-activist member of society. It’s this steady, playful tone, which allows the high-octane – and completely real – clashes between protestors and the police in the movie, to be the most memorable.<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>And yet in all the films, we find the real life captured within them throwing real-life enemies left, right and centre from all over the political spectrum.</strong> Many Uk directors such as the one metioned have successfully found their reactionary characters. And these characters are also the heroes – the ones who lead themselves and us exactly where we want them to: overcoming and moving beyond a domineering adversity – and often, government and financial corporations. And both the hero and the villain are completely unmasked, too, from start to finish.</p>
<p>reactions to this article please tweet <a href="http://www.twitter.com/janemcconnell" target="_blank">@janemcconnell</a> or <a href="http://www.twitter.com/futureartists" target="_blank">@futureartists</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2012/05/future-artists-article-activism-and-new-uk-film-how-the-underground-recreated-the-hero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#Occupymedia &#8211; Project Lost Generation &#8211; Film + experience</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2012/04/occupymedia-project-lost-generation-film-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2012/04/occupymedia-project-lost-generation-film-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markashmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Filmmaking & Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arts funding row]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Of The Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jess search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunshine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Anarchist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=3639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#OCCUPYMEDIA. &#160; One Film Versus The World. The Lost Generation. They occupied Wall Street. NY. DC, Chicago. London. …What if they occupied the media? #occupymedia New Manchester film The Lost Generation is the UK’s newest feature film to be released independently – at the end of the world – on the 20th December 2012, which takes a searing look at freedom, cyberwarfare and our idea of celebrity. &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; FILM SYNOPSIS “Think of a law. She’s broken it. Think of<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2012/04/occupymedia-project-lost-generation-film-experience/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_1257_00000.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3641" title="the lost generation" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_1257_00000-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>#OCCUPYMEDIA.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">One Film Versus The World. The Lost Generation.</span></strong></p>
<p>They occupied Wall Street. NY. DC, Chicago. London.</p>
<p>…What if they <em>occupied the media</em>?</p>
<p><strong>#occupymedia</strong></p>
<p>New Manchester film The Lost Generation is the UK’s newest feature film to be released independently – at the end of the world – on the 20<sup>th</sup> December 2012, which takes a searing look at freedom, cyberwarfare and our idea of celebrity.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/C3zS-1IS7BI?rel=0" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>FILM SYNOPSIS<br />
</strong></p>
<p>“Think of a law. She’s broken it. Think of a crime. She’s committed it. Sarah Jane (SJ) signs up to the ultimate reality TV show.</p>
<p>The rules are simple. Kill your opponent, stay at the top of the leader board, win 10 million pounds.</p>
<p>Fail, and you’re dead.</p>
<p>Set in a dystopic present-day world, public executions have come back into vogue &#8211; only with a gory, reality-TV twist. The Lost Generation exists in a world governed by a corrupt media who have the police in their pocket. Able to scandalise the government at the drop of a phone, the media creates propaganda on how to live a life &#8211; and left desperate civillians in its wake.</p>
<p>But there is hope.</p>
<p>They are called The Unknown.</p>
<p>An underground movement, fragmented youth in revolt, rebels with a cause, are waiting for the right moment to strike back…The Unknown rescue SJ from her certain fate. Despite being part of the walking dead, SJ is taken away and shown a world where choice is a possibility. But the only problem, is, she will have to become the evil she is trying to escape.</p>
<p>In an epic finale, SJ, once the hunted in a reality TV show, now becomes the hunter and those that created her will be her final victims.”</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_5172_00000bw.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3640" title="the lost generation" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_5172_00000bw-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>THE DIRECTOR</strong></p>
<p>Director and producer Mark Ashmore, based his main character SJ on the idea of reality TV stardom – taken to a gory and violent extreme while her foil character, Blair, is based on activists within the underground occupy movements.</p>
<p>“SJ gets hired to kill bankers, MPs: The Lost Generation, it’s a revenge movie; and the idea is that by using all the villains of today’s society, we’ll have the audience cheering in the aisles,” says Ashmore.</p>
<p>“Imagine that a producer was let loose in a world where there aren’t enough new ideas…Taking on twisted visions of a nihilistic media corporation – with everyone thrown to the lions. So this is the extreme of a saturated media environment.”</p>
<p>Contestants in the game become unknowing rats in a maze, forced to break the law and exploited completely by a TV producer fixated by cash, ratings and recognition.</p>
<p>The universal themes of the individual; fear, government doublethink, and especially ideological and covert control have persevered throughout film and literature and can be seen in many 20th century thrillers – science-fiction of course – and even popular novels like The Da Vinci Code contain traces of these ideas. And they’re themes that are pervasive in this film.</p>
<p>The occupation of this film is one of existing <em>within</em> the framework of the media.</p>
<p>By blurring documentary footage from the riots, the Arab Spring and the biggest union march in Manchester, UK…  with the Thriller – and suddenly you have a tale of drama, cruelty and rebellion about the gladiatoresque voyeurism of disposable entertainment, recklessly chewing through the minds and aspirations of its contestants and viewers.</p>
<p><em>The Lost Generation</em> is aimed at an adult audience within the era of the Occupy movement – featuring documented footage from real protests in UK cities – as part of the movie.</p>
<p>Victoria Connett, who plays SJ, says of her character: “A young woman took on something that was bigger than she expected. She’s joined up with a cast on a reality TV show – and she’s taken on more than she can handle. She has to prove herself. But all the time she’s thinking – why has she signed up for this? What was her motivation?”</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/unknownmale.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3642" title="unknown male the lost generation" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/unknownmale-184x300.jpg" alt="" width="184" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Lost Generation. Let the payback begin.</p>
<p>#occupymedia</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>A film by <strong>Mark Ashmore</strong></p>
<p><strong>Produced by Future Artists</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.projectlostgeneration.co.uk/" target="_blank">http://www.projectlostgeneration.co.uk</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2012/04/occupymedia-project-lost-generation-film-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future Artists talkin up a digital revolution &#8211; The third way, time to change the beat.</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/08/future-artists-talkin-up-a-digital-revolution-the-third-way-time-to-change-the-beat/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/08/future-artists-talkin-up-a-digital-revolution-the-third-way-time-to-change-the-beat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markashmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bfi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brands & Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark ashmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UKFC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Project lost generation – a project with a new beat This article a perfect introduction to a variety of future artists workshops that will take place in Leeds, Birminghamduring October and at Channel 4 in London during November. The digital campfire – a social revolution with its own beat. (By  Mark Ashmore FRSA 29/8/11) In this essay I will explore how social communications and convergence culture has put a greater emphasis on storytelling, creating a 3rd tier content distribution network, which is unrecognised by traditional<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/08/future-artists-talkin-up-a-digital-revolution-the-third-way-time-to-change-the-beat/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?attachment_id=1010" rel="attachment wp-att-1010"><img class="aligncenter" title="project lost generation" src="http://futureartists.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/textplacement1-473x670.jpg" alt="" width="473" height="670" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.projectlostgeneration.co.uk/" target="_blank">Project lost generation – a project with a new beat</a></p>
<p><strong>This article a perfect introduction to a variety of <a href="http://www.futureartists.co.uk" target="_blank">future artists</a> workshops that will take place in <a href="http://futureartists.co.uk/2011/05/07/film-and-transmedia-director-workshops-tour/" target="_blank">Leeds, Birmingham</a>during October and at <a href="http://4talent.channel4.com/extra/fasat" target="_blank">Channel 4 in London during November.</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>The digital campfire – a social revolution with its own beat. (By  <a href="http://twitter.com/futureartists">Mark Ashmore </a>FRSA 29/8/11)</p>
<p>In this essay I will explore how social communications and convergence culture has put a greater emphasis on storytelling, creating a 3<sup>rd</sup> tier content distribution network, which is unrecognised by traditional broadcast media and its funders, but participated in by an ever growing audience connected directly to the artist.</p>
<p>I will explore how as a content producer or artist (across film, music, art, literature, game etc) you are about to revolutionise liner/ non liner narrative and be part of a new emerging and ground breaking industry.</p>
<p>But only if you move to your own beat.</p>
<p>So you have discovered this article because someone has ‘shared’ it with you, or maybe you where in the digital wilderness and you ‘stumbled’ across it as you ‘searched’ via google, or maybe you saw that someone ‘liked’ it and out of curiosity thought you would check it out, all terms you should be familiar with if you use social media, you have just entered a digital camp fire.</p>
<p>Welcome <img src="http://futureartists.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" /></p>
<p>These terms are nothing new, what happens in the online world, the rules, the terminology and more important the actions they represent, are the same as community engagement in the real world, and thus I must stress at this point that online social/community tools and their usage are the same as their real world counterpart,</p>
<p>for example, a 140 character tweet about ‘you need to watch my acting showreel’ is the same as interrupting a group of random strangers in a packed coffee shop and telling them ‘you need to watch me perform like a monkey’,</p>
<p>alas, the constant facebook updates telling the world how ‘great’ you are, are the same as a real world situation in which you dominate the conversation by telling people ‘how great you are’ as you spill coffee down their white shirt.</p>
<p>Nobody likes a show off.</p>
<p>this must be at the forefront of the mind throughout its usage and when reading this essay.</p>
<p>So you have found a start of a conversation, this blog is my opinion, but later you can give yours.</p>
<p>New world, old rules.</p>
<p>Anyway we could spend an entire chapter looking at the fu pars and do’s and don’ts of correct usage of social media, but that’s not the point, as long as you use it, in a good or bad way, you are engaging in the digital camp fire, its just that people WILL decide your status in the online community,</p>
<p>I would also like to stress that your writer here is no angel when it comes to social media, so I’m defiantly not a judge.</p>
<p>Back beat the word is on the street,</p>
<p>I am a story teller,</p>
<p>I use a variety of art to communicate what I have to say, I in turn help others to have a voice (paid and unpaid) and in doing so, the art of story as a medium of communication connects with whoever happens to be in my path.</p>
<p>They either like it, hate it, or are indifferent to it, none the less they have experienced it, heard the story, any reaction is a result.</p>
<p>But its this result, that the story teller yearns for, the point of practising the art form, it is this connection with an audience, that for the past 100 years has been guarded for both power and profit by a small group of individuals, I call them the elite,</p>
<p>for those that control the stories, control the world.</p>
<p>Freedom of speech – stories of the street.</p>
<p>200 years of urbanisation and globalisation has seen the way communities in the industrial world work, rest and play completely change.</p>
<p>Freedom of speech is so full of censorship, propaganda and mis-information, and not to forget all the sources are controlled and distributed by very few people, the artists that work within this construct have had to constantly evolve with these increasing  challenges and changes, indoing so, at certain  times, moving away from the original expression and intent,</p>
<p>to demonstrate where we are now, we need to see where we have been.</p>
<p>What follows is in no way a definitive time line of human communication, but should at least give you the understanding to the point I will illustrate later in this essay, and for those at the back of the class remember the keywords of human communication ‘Share or pass on’, ‘Search or to look for’, ‘like or have an opinion on’</p>
<p>Cave Paintings are Prehistoric Cinema, highly skilled artists creating images that reflect stories of that time, stories deemed that important that they where painted in caves to be preserved for generations to learn and ‘share’ ideas from,</p>
<p>to this day historians can get a glimpse into pre-history from these paintings. Cave paintings are a valuable story telling tool for an historic, social and artistic view point.</p>
<p>The artists shared these images with their community, but people would have to search for them as they where buried in caves, and if they liked them, their meaning and location would be shared with others, because they liked it, thus creating a cycle of human interaction with the media.</p>
<p>Oral History</p>
<p>All human cultures have a rich oral or verbal story telling tradition, infact the genesis of camp fire stories is the ability to articulate a story via verbal communication, every story starts with a ‘once upon a time moment’, and those stories deemed worthy enough to be documented are then incased in writing,</p>
<p>At one point in time, only the stories of nobility or religious authority would be written, as it was these sectors of society that had the ability and understanding of the written word, for thousands of years human history if written down was of an elitist perspective. The stories of the workers did’nt get a look in.</p>
<p>Stories shared in a group, re-told verbally as the people could not write. Stories shared in a group where scholars could write then down, where then stored or shared in more elitist surroundings.</p>
<p>The printed word changed this.</p>
<p>Pre 1450, before the invention of the printing press, printing was done in an individual, case by case basis, with printed works placed amongst the elite and not shared with anyone outside of that circle,</p>
<p>this all changed in 1450 with Guttenberg’s printing press, the written word would be available to the masses, if they could read, but more importantly printing, allowed for cartoons, pictures, drawings, images easily understood by the  those that can not read to be freely distributed, the next 500 years post printing press would see a revolution in thinking, society, and modern culture, and the invention of copyright and censorship (by those old elitist’s)</p>
<p>along came the analogue revolution</p>
<p>Late 19<sup>th</sup> century culture saw the emergence of radio, photography and early cinema, more tools for artistic expression, and more ways for stories to be told.</p>
<p>these communication tools would radically begin to be censored, either by licenses, bureaucracy or in a respect to what type of content would be deemed suitable for the person on the receiving end of the artists communiqué, even up until the 1970s the BBC would broadcast in a very distinct BBC voice, aka elitist, where they talking down to the working class?</p>
<p>And this control would continue, with every breakthrough in science which would allow artists to progress their own thinking and expression via invention of new technology, such as television and cable tv, in would come restrictions in the form of censorship or gatekeepers.</p>
<p>This would see a rise in underground or counterculture society, although counter culture has always existed side by side with mainstream culture throughout the ages of communication and art, it is the 1960s counter culture revolution which seemed to breakthrough on all fronts,</p>
<p>from the written word and tradition’s of folk poems/music to rock n roll music, to theatre, art, and cinema, this counter culture change which grew from the various new wave movements (civil rights, war, sexual revolution, equality, social revolution) to name but a few, along with a post war generation of 20 something’s, found themselves in the right place at the right time, to bring the noise.</p>
<p>And its from this counterculture revolution that the ultimate communication tool would arrive, the internet. Built as a communication tool that could be used in the event of cold war nuclear attack,</p>
<p>the internet is a system with no central control, and thus can not be destroyed by being a traditional central target, the internet is an ever spreading entity, version upon version, constantly evolving and changing, and in doing so has now brought with it old opportunities to communicate without the restrictions and baggage of the past.</p>
<p>But with every new technology revolution, comes the old elitist guard wanting to shut down the party, its just this time, we out number them.</p>
<p>Who has the right to tell your story.</p>
<p>Ok so, what I have tried to illustrate, be it rather crudely, is that humans have always communicated via artistic expression as a means of evolving their community, 10,000 years ago, this could have been a camp fire story,</p>
<p>Imagine…</p>
<p>Gathered round at the end of the day, after a hard days hunting,</p>
<p>hunter gathers are sharing the tales of the day</p>
<p>‘don’t go down to the water well in spring, as it is full of lion cubs protected by their angry mother, the lioness will kill you’,</p>
<p>‘why’ someone asks,</p>
<p>and from this, a story is told</p>
<p>‘ a young warrior, brave and fearless, but did not listen to the wise one who told of the lioness and her cubs at the waters edge during spring’,</p>
<p>this camp fire story both a warning in how the immediate surroundings work and that you should always listen to the ‘wise’ storyteller, may come from a tradition the reader might think is extinct, but its still with us, it just that the culture of camp fire is no longer with us, no longer required, no longer deemed necessary, maybe not in practice but at a subconscious level it will always be with us, its human nature, thus control the stories, control human nature, and here is why.</p>
<p>What has evolved now is the digital camp fire, fragmented groups/individuals with similar interests, are being brought together on a massive scale around the glowing embers of social media, this new mainstream phenomenon has only come about in the past 4 years online,</p>
<p>NO you scream, yes sir, cast your thinking back,</p>
<p>my argument is that now the mainstream are all interconnected via smart phones and laptops and endless wifi, now that the mainstream, from grandparents to parents, to younger brothers and sisters and to family friends who can’t work a washing machine but can update a facebook status,</p>
<p>what we have seen that has happened in the last 4 years is that computer science, has gone from the geeky IT crowd, to the mainstream world of celebrity, once the face of computers was Bill Gates with stereotype nerd glasses, his mums knitted sweater and traveling sales men slacks,</p>
<p>Now the face of computing is facebook founder Mark Zuckerburg, a 26 year old billionaire, and now movie star, well by default, or Steve Jobs ex CEO of Apple, who turned the humble grey box of a PC into a designer must have item, Jobs is responsible for turning entire shopping malls into star trek conventions, everyone has a communication device, everyone holds a computer set to text, skype, facebook or stun via a flash on the camera phone.</p>
<p>This radical culture change in the past 4 years, has seen a new culture develop, and I would like to declare it the digital camp fire, a place to share stories.</p>
<p>Social media has sex appeal, its rock and roll, its content is diverse, interesting and radical, across all spectrums, it can be as geeky as the code it has been built upon, or it can be cat videos on youtube, its diversity and accessibility is the key to its mainstream success,</p>
<p>and best of all it has been built by the people, the internet is the embodiment of a city community, cities as geographers will tell you, are built as you need bits, you don’t build the shops till you have the industry, and only when do you have industry do you build the homes, the same goes for the internet,</p>
<p>Now user generated content in the form of everything from blogs, video, audio, etc out numbers the output of any major media producer, youtube contains more video than all the major broadcasters put together, it even includes some of the major broadcasters video!.</p>
<p>So what changed, we went from being the served to the servers.</p>
<p>Put simply the digital campfire is a way to describe a connected community, that gather on the city scape of the internet, around the camp fire with access to everything. with the ability to act in the same way as a real world camp fire community, where the same value systems and support networks are present, just like the old days! Yes technology for a while took us forward and created a fragmented TV dinner society, but a counter culture revolution took place right under the noses of the mainstream media and the rug got pulled back, back to a place it should always be,</p>
<p>This digital community with all its levels and layers present, instead of a one size fits all, 4 channel TV existence, which could be deemed as a dictatorship or at best an autocratic one by the mainstream global media corporations, we are going back to the roots of a diverse, dynamic community which is interconnected and disconnected, a diverse community made up of ever expanding niches, which debates, argues and has opinion, this now takes us into a world where a thousand individuals can set consumer choice instead of a handful of elite gatekeepers making a choice for us. (well it can if we use a variety of platforms to build our digital community on, and not just facebook)</p>
<p>Established media talks of an ever expanding fragmented ‘media landscape’ they look out and go</p>
<p>‘that was all once a land mass, we could plant out giant bill board advertising Harry Potter in the middle, and all those on that the land would see it and go spend £10 on watching it, now the landmass is split into a thousand pieces, where do we put the giant billboard now!’</p>
<p>But for us around the our digital campfire on our own private island, cut off and fragmented as we wish,</p>
<p>We look at this and go</p>
<p>‘I no longer have to endure that giant Harry Potter billboard in the centre of my eyeline, instead, I can choose to hang out on which ever island I wish, take part in what ever is going off in each of these new spaces, and not be interrupted by Harry Potter’</p>
<p>and most of the time, these spaces at best, don’t have mainstream media involved in them at all, those that truly opt out grow fastest.</p>
<p>So what the hell does this have to do with campfire’s.</p>
<p>Back beat the word is on the street</p>
<p>The word on the street, the word around the camp fire, the word is the word, the word is an expression of an idea, an idea comes from a theme, and themes are explored by a community.</p>
<p>We gather around the safety of a place we know, a camp fire is safe and warm, a digital camp fire is a place of like minds and shared knowledge, it’s a safe place to express yourself, it’s a place online.</p>
<p>This exploration to express can take part in the real world, where groups and individuals can meet, or if they are unable to meet because the community is fragmented by either location or time, then these explorations of theme can take place online in a digital space, either on twitter by using a # (hastag) as a conversation marker, in a facebook group, on a forum or in a blog conversation, or even in video on youtube and a host of new video blog services.</p>
<p>It is this word on the street, this word around the digital camp fire that if interesting enough, will as it is shared person by person begin to form the basis of a new peer to peer content distribution network for a new emerging film industry, it is this now that I have given context to my argument, that I know want to share with you, for the rest of this essay.</p>
<p>In the past 4 years a 3<sup>rd</sup> tier of a film industry model has slowly been evolving,</p>
<p>I call it a 3<sup>rd</sup> tier as I see the top tier as being mainly Hollywood film 100 million + budgets, made for the multiplex, sequels, spectacles and star vehicles to service the PR press that sustains them,</p>
<p>the 2<sup>nd</sup> tier are more conservative budget films, majority can be classed as European/world cinema or art house movies, in this 2<sup>nd</sup> tier are also the straight to DVD titles.</p>
<p>But what has emerged and has been documented in many indy film-making articles on the DIY scene, is now a new 3<sup>rd</sup> pier of film-making, which is becoming ever more vibrant as technology progresses,</p>
<p>An Industry that uses a new wave of thinking as its currency, new digital tools of communication and even new types of story telling to get its point across, this vibrant and new film/content industry is so new it is yet to be defined and those that practice it are labeled with a variety of media tags, by the main stream media, cross platform, transmedia etc, but its this 3<sup>rd</sup> tier which I believe will be the new mainstream in just 4 years time.</p>
<p>And here is why.</p>
<p>The rules of 3<sup>rd</sup> tier film production</p>
<p>1)    Owning the means of production – the DSLR film revolution is the equivalent of the 16mm film revolution of the French new wave, cheap portable cameras, instant digital files ready for editing on portable laptops in an instant. Nobody can tell you what to shoot.</p>
<p>2)    Owning the means to distribution free of censorship, 3<sup>rd</sup> tier film making is censorship free, instead of big brother dictating content, taste and decency its now peer to peer review, if your project does not fit with one peer group, another group might like it, online video is sharable and free to replicate.</p>
<p>3)    Owning the means to PR – social media if done correctly is not an exercise in ‘me’ culture, instead your public relationships should be a two way conversation, and at best your public/audience should also become your collaborators, way before the screening, ideally from the idea stage.</p>
<p>4)    Digital networks enable the film making process to be outsourced across the world, a film made in London, can outsource its special effects to a group in Texas, amateurs and hobbyists they might be, but with the same SFX packages as the mainstream media the results can be the same or even better.</p>
<p>5)    Raising finance – film making used to be a costly game, new producers have lowered the costs of production and distribution meaning less finance is required, if the themes and ideas are not catered for in the mainstream, then finance can be raised in a variety of ways, from the begging bowl tactics of ‘give me £10 to make my film I will give you a DVD when its done’, to more innovative takes on crowd funding. From partnering up with established players in that market, to brand the project, share networks, to negotiating pro bona kit and talent, or sell non film-making goods and services around the film, from t-shirts to seminars to screenings of films that relate to the films subject matter. All sustained by the vibrant community and culture active around your own digital camp fire.</p>
<p>6)    Exhibition – the cinema was once the preserve of the elite, but the modern 21<sup>st</sup> century cinema is not the multiplex, digital HD projectors and blu ray players mean that cinema can be anywhere, from a park or beach, to cave or scout hut, a cinema can be anywhere where people gather, a cinema is a story being told around a camp fire. Get your community off online and into the real world, meetup’s around cinema are great ice breakers.</p>
<p>7)    Exhibition networks – social media allows for groups with their own cinema spaces be it pop up or established venue, places and people with their own audiences to now link up with 3<sup>rd</sup> tier content creators, to play a gig circuit, film-makers become like a band, the film-makers can either turn up and show the film themselves, or at best the themes and ideas of the project will have been known by the exhibitor group since its inception via social media interaction, and thus they will be able to introduce the project to an audience, the great thing about this is that screenings can take place anywhere in the world, and the content can be e-mailed, shared via yousend it, or even given to them as a bit torrent.</p>
<p>8)    You and your audience operate in the same space, your audience have the ability to create as you do, and thus must be treated with respect, why share or show them a story or piece of artwork that they can easily create or manufacture themselves, story is key, this is a great place for the art form to progress and this is why we see the constant rise of artistic expression via transmedia and ‘new wave’ cinema being explored by artists from around the world, artists no longer asking permission, if the audience can make it, share it themselves they easily could be part of the 3<sup>rd</sup> tier, so if you want to be the best you can be, you have to raise your game and experiment.</p>
<p>9)    VOD is the new DVD, itunes for so long ruled the roost on VOD and very few platforms allowed for producers to make a decent return on their content, with Daily Motion now trying to attract high quality videos and sharing advertising revenue, you tube gearing up for its evolution on google tv by publicizing its partnership program more and more and the likes of dynamo player and distrify allowing for producers to control all the distribution and price point for content with really good splits, means that video producers can now put VOD into the business plan. And more importantly share directly with their digital camp fire community at various stages of the creation process.</p>
<p>10)                   The most important rule of all, is don’t treat your audience as dumb, the 3<sup>rd</sup> tier has been created as a reaction to the elitist mainstream who feed their audiences with the same reality TV, films based on theme park rides and tv shows and recycled remade stories, dare to be different and if you allow the conditions on social media, your audience will support you, they might not like what you make, but they might like you as a person, as an artist, it’s the personal, the knowing you, that will allow you to thrive and survive around the digital camp fire.</p>
<p>And you know you have a thriving 3<sup>rd</sup> tier film-making industry when you see 1<sup>st</sup> tier and 2<sup>nd</sup> tier attempts at copying the underground from the way the film is created, its marketing, its distribution etc,</p>
<p>but like a good goldsmith, you the audience will be able to spot a fake a mile off!</p>
<p>Does this make sense, we can talk about this tweet me @futureartists</p>
<p>Ok so what I have tried to illustrate is that you as a storyteller and artist are free without restrictions except for the baggage that you bring to your own art practice yourself,</p>
<p>we have come full circle in the evolution of the camp fire, from small community groups sharing ideas, themes and stories around a nightly camp fire in real time, to the 21<sup>st</sup> century digital space, that allows for global fragmented groups and individuals to gather and converse in storytelling in whatever media form they choose, whether it be the written tweet, the tagged picture, the free youtube content or the VOD that has value to a community, the gate keepers have now gone,</p>
<p>What exists is a very interesting and vibrant 3<sup>rd</sup> tier of film makers a list of which I will provide at the bottom of this essay. This 3<sup>rd</sup> tier is looked down upon by a film industry only interested in making a financial profit to support a large framework, and a lot of people in it purely for the profit and not for the art of story telling, in my heart I wish to see this crumble, an industry that treats its audience as idiots giving it substandard fare at a high price and starving the competition out of the game via a monopoly on supply and distribution, is not a very cultural diverse place to be,</p>
<p>I feel its our job as 3<sup>rd</sup> tier film industry to win over our audience and turn them into supporters and educate them as best we can into the choices they have available to them, and with more and more film-makers realizing the power they now have, its time to stop chasing down what was, and start working on what can be, so start ‘sharing’, ‘like’, and search for new voices and support them with ideas, encouragement and pay for their work, on DVD, VOD or at a screening near you.</p>
<p>I hope to see you at our own underground culture Oscars one day, celebrating a new wave of cinema, created from global culture, a meting pot of stories, presented in new entertaining and thought provoking ways,</p>
<p>Ways that the mainstream will have to copy one day to keep up.</p>
<p>It will do us all a world of good, in times of great change new opportunities arise, a new beat if you will.</p>
<p>The digital campfire – a social revolution with its own beat, and spread the beat, please RE-TWEET, POST ON FACEBOOK and E-mail the URL to your own camp fire community, the more the word on the street gets out, the better the art that emerges from the 3<sup>rd</sup> tier becomes.</p>
<p>Mark Ashmore FRSA Co founder of <a href="http://www.futureartists.co.uk" target="_blank">Future Artists LTD</a> / <a href="http://www.meetup.com/futureartists" target="_blank">Future Artists live creative Co-Op</a>.</p>
<p>Tweet us <a href="http://www.twitter/futureartists" target="_blank">@futureartists</a></p>
<p>Further projects of the 3rd tier film-making revolution, projects of note</p>
<p><a href="http://4talent.channel4.com/extra/fasat" target="_blank">Invisible Circus: No Dress Rehearsal (distributed by Future Artists)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://justdoitfilm.com/" target="_blank">Just do it: a tale of modern outlaws</a> (Emily James)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.presspauseplay.com/" target="_blank">Press, Pause, Play</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.projectlostgeneration.co.uk/" target="_blank">Project Lost Generation</a> (By Articles writer Mark Ashmore)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sounditoutdoc.com/" target="_blank">Sound it out doc</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.peoplevsgeorge.com/splash/" target="_blank">The People Vs George Lucas</a></p>
<p>let us know about your and we will add it to the list! @futureartists</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/08/future-artists-talkin-up-a-digital-revolution-the-third-way-time-to-change-the-beat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday: Digital Bootcamp at the Frontline Club</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/01/sunday-digital-bootcamp-at-the-frontline-club/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/01/sunday-digital-bootcamp-at-the-frontline-club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ingrid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Hip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience-engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdfunding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Bootcamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontline Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/category/fromthehip/?p=596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And there&#8217;s digital joy in London this weekend too &#8211; Digital Bootcamp is coming back to the Frontline Club (where it all started back in 2009 &#8211; which is a long time in technology years!) Digital Bootcamp is a master class designed to help you and your film navigate the rapidly evolving digital landscape. Shooting People&#8217;s James Mullighan will guide you through a series of case studies and practical examples (with a focus on documentaries) to help you get up<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/01/sunday-digital-bootcamp-at-the-frontline-club/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there&#8217;s digital joy in London this weekend too &#8211; <a href="http://frontlineclub.com/training/2011/01/digital-bootcamp.html" target="_blank">Digital Bootcamp</a> is coming back to the Frontline Club (where it all started back in 2009 &#8211; which is a long time in technology years!) Digital Bootcamp is a master class designed to help you and your film navigate the rapidly evolving digital landscape. Shooting People&#8217;s James Mullighan will guide you through a series of case studies and practical examples (with a focus on documentaries) to help you get up to speed with many of the digital tools now available to storytellers.</p>
<p><a href="http://frontlineclub.com/training/2011/01/digital-bootcamp.html"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-600" title="bootcampmain" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/bootcampmain1.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="170" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2011/01/sunday-digital-bootcamp-at-the-frontline-club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opening Weekends Are Not For Wimps!</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/opening-weekends-are-not-for-wimps/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/opening-weekends-are-not-for-wimps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>debs@catsiye.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Africa United - first time feature of a Shooting People member since 2002 - opening in UK cinemas this weekend, and... well, have a read and see what you think. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone told me 18 months ago that a film I directed would have just opened in over 200 screens across the UK &#8211; complete with bus and tv ads &#8211; I pretty much wouldn&#8217;t have believed them. It&#8217;s been a crazy journey &#8211; from short films and one-line idea to feature cinema release in less than 2 years &#8211; but here we are.<br />
<br />
<div id="attachment_550" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="www.africaunitedmovie.com"><img class="size-medium wp-image-550" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/AUpre-release-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Africa United is in UK cinemas from Oct 22nd</p></div><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.africaunitedmovie.com/">AFRICA UNITED</a> has had a brilliant audience response in previews and our Toronto and London premieres &#8211; we had standing ovations in both premieres, and scored more highly in the official test screening than any family film the screening organisation had ever tested &#8211; but the film has split critics. The argument seems mostly to be that you shouldn&#8217;t deal openly with issues of HIV, child soldiers etc etc in a film that expects to find a family audience. I don&#8217;t agree, but it&#8217;s what a few of them think, and what they&#8217;ve printed. And &#8211; understandably &#8211; what a broad audience appears to have believed! We have just tanked on our opening weekend&#8230; We took significantly less than the wolf movie, and the owls left us for dust!<br />
<br />
This is sad for the following reasons:<br />
<br />
- Africa United is genuinely a really enjoyable and heart-warming film. It&#8217;s funny, naive, layered and post-modern, as well as being energetic and geared towards kids &#8211; most people both cry and laugh outloud during the 90 minutes<br />
<br />
- we tried to break the rules &amp; do something new. It&#8217;s part live-action, part-animation (animation created brilliantly by BlinkInk from recycled Rwandan stuff) &#8211; it has an awesome soundtrack from seriously talented composer/producer Bernie Gardner<br />
<br />
- we literally bust our asses making it &#8211; an 8 week shoot, in 3 african countries, 5 inexperienced kids in the lead roles, first-time director, first-time writer, intense post-schedule &#8211; jungles, explosions, hippos, lakes, visas, flash floods, 35mm, intense delivery dates, FIFA, the lot<br />
<br />
- football is the metaphor not the subject, but it&#8217;s a loving tribute to the beautiful game worldwide<br />
<br />
- if we make it to profit (unlikely, but still) we can give a full 25% of it to kids dealing with the issues touched on<br />
<br />
Shooting People has, in many ways, been my film school. I started trying to get into the UK film industry in 2002, and have been a shooter since then. My first jobs as a 1st AD on short film shoots were via the film-makers digests, and over the years I have used the discussion boards and member profiles to figure things out, crew and cast shorts, find a wonderful editor, hear out about masterclasses, attend festivals, and basically learn the ropes! I bought my Final Cut Pro system 2nd-hand here, and the digests have often felt like a bit of a lifeline to any kind of faint pulse of a film industry when things have been quiet.<br />
<br />
I&#8217;m not sure where AFRICA UNITED will go from here. We had a huge amount of exposure &#8211; and the amazing teams at Pathé and Freuds put everything behind it &#8211; but you win some, you lose some I guess!? It seems mad that it comes down to a weekend after all of this, but it does and we know it! In any case, I would love to know what you guys make of it. If you&#8217;re interested and willing to make a trip to the cinema this week &#8211; please do! And let me know what you think? Cinema listings should be up and available now, but from the weekend onwards &#8211; I can&#8217;t promise <img src='http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<br />
This comes with all best wishes, a big belief in collaboration and respect for everyone who says &#8216;why not&#8217; -<br />
<br />
<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/cards/catsiye">Debs Gardner-Paterson</a><br />
Shooting People member since &#8217;02 and director of &#8216;Africa United&#8217;<br />
<br />
<strong>&#8216;Africe United&#8217; is showing at the Frontline Club, Paddington, London on <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/calendar/index.php?mode=detail&#038;event=14580&#038;day=2010-11-15&#038;event_type=single">Monday 15 November</a>, with Debs introducing the screening followed by a special guest Q&amp;A.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/opening-weekends-are-not-for-wimps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Together We Are Stronger</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/together-we-are-stronger/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/together-we-are-stronger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filmmaker Emily James discusses how &#8216;together we are stronger&#8217; in the making of Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world - a feature documentary about climate activists, using crowd funding by donation and volunteer crew. Already there have been over 100 people who’ve given generously of their time and energy to make Just Do It happen, and no doubt there will be many more before we are done. We’ve had 31 camera people, 25 editors, 17 production volunteers,<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/together-we-are-stronger/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><br />
<em>Filmmaker <a href="http://www.emily-james.com/" target="_blank">Emily James</a></em><em> discusses how &#8216;together we are stronger&#8217; in the making of <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world </a></em><em>- a feature documentary about climate activists, using crowd funding by donation and volunteer crew.</em><br />
<span><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7qiP8Qr3hhE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7qiP8Qr3hhE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
<span><br />
Already there have been over 100 people who’ve given generously of their time and energy to make <em>Just Do It </em>happen, and no doubt there will be many more before we are done. We’ve had 31 camera people, 25 editors, 17 production volunteers, plus tons of other people helping with the website, with networking, with strategy, graphics, music, legal, press, and much more.<br />
<span><br />
Some of these people have been attracted to the subject of the film, others to the plans for <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/" target="_blank">Creative Commons</a> release and the chance to help a worthwhile independent film project. For many of these people the non-profit nature of the film allows them to feel comfortable about giving their time, and in return it helps us to feel more comfortable about asking people for their help. Some of them talk about working on <em>Just Do It</em> as an ‘offset’ to their other, more commercial or corporate, but less emotionally rewarding work.  For those who make longer commitments to the project we always try to make sure that they are gaining skills that will be valuable to them elsewhere. But by and large, we all just want to see this film get made.<br />
</span><br />
A project of this sort is not particularly a model for how all films, or indeed any other film, could or should be made. It is by no means a particularly practical ‘business model’, nor is it ‘efficient’. It will take us much longer to make it this way, and we are constantly hamstrung by our lack of funds. But it is a testament to what groups of passionate and committed people can achieve, despite the odds.<br />
<span><br />
All of us who are making <em>Just Do </em>It really want the film to be made with true independence and without commercial or editorial pressure.  But much as we’d like to, we can’t pay our rent with fairy dust, or eat rainbows. And having decided to try to make the film <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-i-said-‘no’-to-the-broadcasters/" target="_blank">without a broadcaster</a>, and to support the Creative Commons movement through a non-commercial release, we eliminated many cash flow avenues.<br />
<span><br />
And so we need to reach out to the <a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/" target="_blank">crowd to fund the film </a>through donations. So far 262 people have donated to the project. That’s great, but it’s not a crowd. It’s a large house party maybe, and we love everyone of them, but it’s not a crowd. We need to add a 0 to that number, or even two 0’s. Then we’d have the crowd that we need.<br />
<span><br />
Part of the problem is that people are very unaccustomed to this kind of relationship with a film. Films are something which get made and then offered to you to select which one you’d like to pay to see. You make your selection, hand over your dosh, and like it or lump it. Or we pay with our license fee, or by watching ads. But still it is a fare on offer, to consume or not. We are used to this, we know this way. But we are not used to being given the chance to participate in deciding what gets made to begin with, audiences are not accustomed to being in the seat of the commissioning editor or grant maker.  With <em>Just Do It</em>, we are asking people to shift from the role of consumer, to that of philanthropist.  We need a smallish crowd to support us to make this film, so that we can then give it to a much larger crowds when it’s done. People are not buying something for themselves, they are helping something to exists for the greater good.<br />
<span><br />
I am confident that we will finish the film, one way or another, and that is because of all of the people who are helping to make that a certainty, but it is also a leap of faith. I began this process not knowing where it would take me, and along the way I’ve met literally hundreds of amazing, generous, active, and committed people. The sorts of people who want to see a better world, and are prepared to put their time and their energy where it matters. These people have given me the faith to embrace this ‘wilfully optimistic’ business model, and be the change I want to see.<br />
<span><br />
So I end with a thank you to everyone who has helped so far to make this film happen, and to all those who will help before we are done.  We literally could not have done it without you.<br />
<span><br />
<em>To find out more about Emily’s current project – Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world check out the website – <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk</a>. Emily has been guest blogging about the project here at Shooting People over the last couple of weeks to coincide with 20 days of match funding from Lush (the soap people). During this period, all donations to the project will be matched, pound for pound, but Lush Cosmetics, so go on over and make a donation – </em><em><a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days</a> There&#8217;s only 4 more days to go!</em><br />
</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/together-we-are-stronger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Crowd Funding</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filmmaker Emily James discusses why she’s choosing to fund her next film, Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world - a feature documentary about climate activists, using crowd funding by donation. So, if one’s publishing under a Creative Commons license (see previous blog), and not charging for viewing the work, how can one raise the funding to make it? In the long term, I don’t know what the big solution is. But it’s clear that big<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/">...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><br />
<em>Filmmaker <a href="http://www.emily-james.com" target="_blank">Emily James</a></em><em> discusses why she’s choosing to fund her next film, <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk" target="_blank">Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world </a></em><em>- a feature documentary about climate activists, using crowd funding by donation.</em><br />
<span><br />
So, if one’s publishing under a Creative Commons license (<a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/" target="_blank">see previous blog</a>), and not charging for viewing the work, how can one raise the funding to make it? In the long term, I don’t know what the big solution is. But it’s clear that big changes are coming, and I’d like to see us aiming in a direction that empowers the widest number of people to participate in the decisions about what gets made and what gets seen. And ideally to finance production of creative work without reliance on advertising, brands, or commercial investment, because all of these distort and warp the creative process in a socially unproductive manner.<br />
<span><br />
<a href="http://just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-520" title="Help fund this film" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/fund_btn.png" alt="" width="203" height="53" /></a>In the short term, the solution that we’ve come up with for <em>Just Do It</em> is Crowd Funding. Crowd Funding is a relatively new idea that’s gaining lots of steam.  The basic model is that a core group of supports – anywhere from 300 to 30,000 – each contribute a small amount towards the cost of production. In some cases, such as <em>The Age of Stupid</em>, this was an ‘investment’ and the person owned a piece of the film. However taking investments means you need to recoup, which means you’ll have to charge people to see it.  So with <em>Just Do It</em>, we’re looking for a greater number of people to give smaller amounts, but to give them as donations rather than investments.  If people want to think of it as ‘pre-buying’ the film, they can. They will also get other little perks too.  However we prefer to think of it as being supported by them as artists to make something great to share with the world, rather than simply selling them something we’ve made for their consumption. But that’s just us.<br />
<span><br />
What’s important to us is that we have the freedom to pursue making the film without having to be concerned over it making back lots of money when it’s done. I don’t want to be making creative decisions about the film and thinking ‘what will sell better?’ or ‘which way is more likely to attract a sales agent?’. It just might be that the <em>best</em> film to make with <em>Just Do It</em> &#8211; the one which has the story best and is truest to the subject &#8211; might not <em>be</em> the one which would gain the most commercial success, but it’s the film that we’re determined to make.<br />
<span><br />
And we believe that there are a lot of other people out there who would like to see our version &#8211; the version that isn’t constrained by Broadcaster editorial departments, or investors’ legal concerns. There must be at least 30,000 people out there who’d like to see this film. I’m certain of that, it’s really not a very big number. And if each of them makes a donation, we’re golden.  Alternatively, in the ‘commercial market’, if you want to raise the budget for a feature doc, you’ve got to be able to convince financiers that it will get an audience in the multi-millions.  This is in part because only about 10% of the money that people pay to watch the film ever get’s back to the producers (and that’s if they’re lucky, often it’s less!). They’ve got to get a lot of bums on seats to cover the rest of the machine. We’ve just got to gather a small crowd to support us directly.<br />
<span><br />
Like crowd sourcing, or micro-investment, the idea is to harness the power of a crowd of people who want to see this film get made. Already a small crowd of over 100 people have given generously of their time to work on the film.  And we hope that a crowd of donors will now come to help fund it.<br />
<span><br />
Now, this next part may seem like a leap, but I think that ultimately some form of ‘crowd funding’ is the antidote to advertising. Advertising is one of the most insidious evils of our time.  It warps our brains and drives our psychotic consumption.  We think that advertising allows us to watch things ‘for free’, but we forget to factor in the real price that we are paying. As we grope our way forward into the new media world, and figure out what the new financial models will be, I’m hoping that we can collectively resist the trend towards branded content and private ad revenue, and rather aim for something much more similar to the Licence Fee, or its not so distant cousin, the subscription model. HBO is a very good contemporary example of how the subscription model allows for much greater creative risk taking, and as a result, much stronger and inventive program making. The BBC and HBO are arguably the two best and biggest tent-poles proping up the creativity and value to viewers across the whole of contemporary TV, and both are financed in a way that gives them independence from advertising or sponsorship. Let us remember this as we work out where we are going.<br />
<span><br />
<em>To find out more about Emily’s current project &#8211; Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world check out the website – <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk</a>. Emily will be guest blogging about the project here at Shooting People over the next couple of weeks to coincide with 20 days of match funding from Lush (the soap people). During this period, all donations to the project will be matched, pound for pound, but Lush Cosmetics, so go on over and make a donation &#8211; </em><em><a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days</a></em><br />
<span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-crowd-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Creative Commons</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Becky Hogge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filmmaker <a href="http://www.emily-james.com" target="_blank">Emily James</a> discusses why she’s choosing to release her next film,<a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk" target="_blank"> <em>Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world </em></a>- a feature documentary about climate activists, under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">Creative Commons licence</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span> </span><br />
Filmmaker <a href="http://www.emily-james.com" target="_blank">Emily James</a> discusses why she’s choosing to release her next film,<a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk" target="_blank"> <em>Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world </em></a>- a feature documentary about climate activists, under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">Creative Commons licence</a>.<br />
<span> </span><br />
<a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-515" title="Just Do It" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/mail-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>For me, publishing <em>Just Do It </em>under a Creative Commons licence – free to watch, free to share &#8211; is about a wilful rejection of the economic model that binds current creative work (and in this case filmmaking). Making films is expensive and so it’s unsurprising that it has become more an industry than an art. What is more, the decisions about what gets made (and what doesn’t) have been largely privatised and are now driven almost entirely by commercial concerns (even if that commercial concern is simply getting enough ‘market share’). I’d like to see more space for films (and other work) to be judged on different merits than just box office takings.  This may sound naïve, but ‘naïve’ suggests that I don’t understand how ‘the real world works’. Actually,  I understand all too well how this world currently works – I just don’t like it, and I think it could be different.<br />
<span> </span><br />
The concept of a creative commons, where ideas can be shared freely, with everyone contributing openly to a shared conversation, without copyright restriction or commercial interests appeals to me at a basic level. Imagine the rich diversity of expression, the breadth of available entertainment, and the level of participation and cross-pollination.  Of course, in the utterly capitalist world that we currently live in, it seems almost absurdly idealistic, and I might as well be dancing around with fairies in my tie-died hair.  But then, at the same time, developments in Open Source and Free Culture practice make it feel like it really could be just over the next horizon, if only we chose to go that way.  So choosing to publish under a Creative Commons licence is for me an act of faith and an attempt to push in the right direction.  [for a further and better elaboration on the importance of Creative Commons, check out <a href="http://barefoottechie.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/help-raise-20k-in-20-days-for-just-do-it-an-exciting-new-cc-film-about-climate-change-activism/" target="_blank">this blog about </a><em><a href="http://barefoottechie.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/help-raise-20k-in-20-days-for-just-do-it-an-exciting-new-cc-film-about-climate-change-activism/" target="_blank">Just Do It </a></em><a href="http://barefoottechie.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/help-raise-20k-in-20-days-for-just-do-it-an-exciting-new-cc-film-about-climate-change-activism/" target="_blank">from Becky Hogge</a>, expert on Open Rights, and friend of the project]<br />
<span> </span><br />
In the case of <em>Just Do It</em>, I had a further reason for wanting to avoid a commercial model: I really did not want to exploit the people who were in the film.  I use the word ‘exploit’ here in a literal sense, not an overly emotive one, but both apply.<br />
<span> </span><br />
If I had followed the standard, contemporary funding model for a film such as this, I would be investing my time into a product, getting some pre-sale (the equivalent of an ‘advance’) from distributors and sales agents, maybe some private investment too, and then planning to pull in earnings from DVD and TV sales.  Now, to be clear, very few projects on this model ever go into profit, and the vast majority don’t even manage to cover the initial ‘investments’- particularly that of the filmmakers time. Filmmakers are passionate about their projects, and so often engage in a form of ‘auto-exploitation’ in order to get them made. Often they justify this to themselves on the ground that they will own the finished film, and so, when it’s a success (as they must believe it will be!), they will be financially rewarded. The sad truth is that time after time we see that even rather successful films still don’t ever pull in enough to adequately compensate the heavy investment of time and energy. So it’s not a particularly successful model, but it’s a pretty dominant one and it’s the way that most independent filmmakers find themselves having to work.<br />
<span> </span><br />
But with <em>Just Do It</em>, I simply did not want to make a film about these activists which I would then own as an asset and would have to then exploit to recoup my investment.  That’s not the relationship that I want to have with this film, with my contributors, with the many other people working on the film, nor with my audience.  It felt inappropriate, and out of step with the themes and content of the film. So <em>Just Do It</em> seemed like the perfect film for the sort of Creative Commons experiment that I’d been wanting to do for some while. In so doing, I could attempt to focus on the film creating real culture-shift, rather than on making something that would be a commercial success.<br />
<span> </span><br />
Again, I’m aware of how naïve some will think this sounds, but that’s only because this set of commercial and exploitative relationships have become so ingrained in our culture, that we can’t see beyond them.  Making ‘good business sense’ has become the yard stick by which we measure every plan, and this failure of imagination &#8211; this acceptance that markets and balance sheets should rule every part of our lives – must be vigorously resisted, particularly when it comes to our creative and social spaces.<br />
<span> </span><br />
So we need to start exploring new models and pushing at the boundaries of this box that we’re in as hard as we can.  As with everything in life, if we passively accept the status-quo, we’ve got little hope for a better future. The fast moving world of communication technologies is quickly undermining the old Copyright models, and by participating in the Creative Commons and Copy-left movement, I hope that we can be part of building a new model which is less about control and ownership and more about freedom, sharing, and collaboration.<br />
<span> </span><br />
<em> To find out more about Emily’s current project &#8211; Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world check out the website – <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk</a>. Emily will be guest blogging about the project here at Shooting People over the next couple of weeks to coincide with 20 days of match funding from Lush (the soap people). During this period, all donations to the project will be matched, pound for pound, but Lush Cosmetics, so go on over and make a donation</em>. &#8211; <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk/20k-in-20-days</a><br />
<span> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-creative-commons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So how did I find myself here?&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/433/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/433/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Skynner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funding the Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danny dyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Skynner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joanna lumley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john hannah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oodle studios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romantic comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Shop Asylum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Film Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UKFC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For my second blog I thought it might be useful to supply a bit of background, so that when I start ranting in future blogs about the perversity of the film business, (and I will) you will know it’s based on some experience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/TSA-POSTER-no-co2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-459" title="TSA POSTER no co2" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/TSA-POSTER-no-co2-212x300.jpg" alt="" width="212" height="300" /></a><br />
<br />
For my second blog I thought it might be useful to supply a bit of background, so that when I start ranting in future blogs about the perversity of the film business, (and I will) you will know it’s based on some experience.<br />
<br />
Years ago, I directed an episode of A&amp;E that featured a bunch of Yugoslav characters and it was there that I met my co-writer, Rad Lazar.   Once the show was completed, another of the actors, Velibor Topic, invited me round to dinner with Rad and a few of their other friends and they told me some stories about their first experiences of the UK.  Wearing toilet mats after mistaking them for colourful furry waterproof capes, until one of them noticed one in a loo, was obviously funny.  The attempt to earn some money by entering an art competition, getting the help of schizophrenics to design a sculpture, winning the competition then building it out of dental amalgam and dragging it through the streets of Hastings to its’ place of display late one night was funny/bizarre/extraordinary on a whole different level and I was hooked.<br />
A few years later we wrote the script and after refining it a few times and attaching John Hannah, Joanna Lumley and Danny Dyer, an experienced producer took it on.  It took him about a year to put together the budget of 2.2 million and attach a sales agent and that’s when things started to get weird.  Nearly half of the budget was coming from a well-known film-financing outfit and they required a pre-sale to demonstrate the sales potential of the film.  They gave us two weeks notice of this requirement, before a cut off point for completing the legals etc.  So we went to talk to our well known sales agent, who declined to help us find the pre-sale and told us we had to get the pre-sale ourselves.  We didn’t know anyone and didn&#8217;t have time to build the necessary relationships, so we didn’t get it and the financing fell apart.  To this day I cannot understand why they did this and they wouldn’t explain, but it is a perfect example of the perversity that seems to run like a theme through the business.  Many people seem to think it is part of their absolute responsibility to make making a film as impossible as they can, from sales agents refusing to sell, to financiers creating conditions that all the other financiers will not tolerate etc, it is commonplace.  A common justification is that, as ‘gatekeepers’ (you could cut the self importance with a knife it’s so dense) it is their responsibility to make sure only the best get through because it is a limited market and investors mustn’t lose their money.  Well, oh noble gatekeepers, if that were true, only great films would get made and financiers would rarely lose their money and that is so far from the case that it is almost deranged to voice that justification.<br />
<br />
So anyway, we tried to put the financing together again.  Sally Caplan at the Premiere Fund loved the script and amended the constitution of the Film Council to allow her to fund a pilot, but she couldn’t do more because it was too low budget for a Premiere Fund film (obviously I offered to take a bigger fee, but apparently it doesn’t work that way, shame) and being too commercial for the New Cinema Fund it wasn’t going to get any more support there.  There’s that perversity again, can you believe the Film Council wasn’t set up to support low budget commercial films, what the hell is that about?  To any normal way of thinking a low budget commercial film, (or to put it another way, a product that doesn’t cost very much but will sell in large numbers), would be the Grail of Grails?  But no.<br />
<br />
I think my producer felt he had given it his best shot after that and so finally we parted company (as friends I think) and I went it alone.  There were many times around then when I also really thought I should give up, but hope and aspiration, after a certain period of time, tend to turn into obsessive stubborn doggedness, which is helpful.  It was about then that I had an idea.  Now ideas come wearing various coats, some you like, some are brash and others are just plain scary.  This one was like a road sign, one of the big flashing ones you get beside the motorway and though it scared the crap out of me and my instinct was to dismiss it, it kept gnawing away, and after a few hugely coincidental things happened as well, I finally became convinced that I was just going to have to do something about this one.   But, what?  Well, more about that next time, but in the meantime, why not check out the website <a title="Tea Shop Asylum " href="http://teashopasylum.com" target="_blank">www.teashopasylum.com</a> or have a look at the trailer cut from the Film Council funded pilot&#8230;<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vimeo.com/8530885">Tea Shop Asylum &#8211; Trailer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/433/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I said ‘no’ to the Broadcasters.</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-i-said-%e2%80%98no%e2%80%99-to-the-broadcasters/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-i-said-%e2%80%98no%e2%80%99-to-the-broadcasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shooter Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting People]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/blog/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guest blogger, Emily James, is currently in production on a feature documentary about environmental direct action groups, including Plane Stupid, Climate Camp, and Climate Rush. The film is crowd funding, and will be released under a Creative Commons license in early 2011.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span> </span><br />
<em>Guest blogger, Emily James, is currently in production on a feature documentary about environmental direct action groups, including Plane Stupid, Climate Camp, and Climate Rush. The film is crowd funded, and will be released under a Creative Commons license in early 2011.</em><br />
<span> </span><br />
<span> </span><br />
<img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-471" title="emily-james" src="http://shootingpeople.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/emily-james-1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />Getting a TV broadcast commission has its pros and cons. On the upside, you’ve got the money to make your film and a relatively guaranteed audience. On the down side you lose editorial, stylistic, and production control, and from the filmmaker’s point of view, the compromises can often be difficult to swallow.<br />
<span> </span><br />
I’ve made plenty of films for TV, for a variety of broadcasters, and I’ve learned the game. I went to talk to a few of them when I first started filming for what would become <em><a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">Just Do It</a></em>, but I quickly realised that on this one, I wasn’t prepared to compromise.<br />
<span> </span><br />
Why not? Well, a few reasons:<br />
<span> </span><br />
Firstly, it had taken a great deal of time and effort to gain the trust of the activists whom I was filming, and I didn’t want to sell out that trust either by framing their story in the style of storytelling which passes for ‘objectivity’ at the moment, or in a way which broadcasters and commissioning editors believe ‘audiences will come to’. I realised that I believed in what the activists were doing, and I wasn’t going to pretend differently.<br />
<span> </span><br />
Secondly, I wanted to pursue my vision for the film, and to have the freedom to make what I believed could be an important and significant social contribution I believed that there was an audience for a film which playfully and cheekily championed the cause of direct action, and that with the privileged access which I had, I could make a unique film which did not fit easily into TV boxes, but would be all the more exciting for it. The film I had in mind might not attract 2.3 million TV viewers at 9pm on a Thursday (though to be honest, I think it would if given the chance), but I genuinely believed that internationally, there was most certainly a large audience who would come to it.  I wanted the film to be able to find that audience over time, rather than shot-gunned out in one splurge on TV and then never seen again.<br />
<span> </span><br />
Thirdly, this film was going to be a legal minefield. *sigh* As Marina (one of our main characters) often says, “frankly, the law is an ass”. Broadcasters have to be careful. They have their licenses and deep pockets to protect. I’ve had my fair share of forced changes to shows in order to get the stamp of approval from the legal department, and I’ve witnessed a shed load more. I knew that I would want to take risks with this film: I would want to name names, and let my characters state their case against the targets of their direct action. If I self-published, the risks would be mine to take.<br />
<span> </span><br />
And finally, I wanted to go all-out and pursue a bold vision for the entire project – not just on screen, but off – and make it a forward looking experiment in Creative Commons, crowd funding, and bespoke distribution.  A film which was about people coming together to work towards a progressive vision of the future seemed like the perfect place to test out these new ideas.<br />
<span> </span><br />
With the production of <em>Just Do It</em> we are attempting to re-imagine the relationship between audience and producers, shifting audiences from being passive consumers to active participants and decision makers. It’s an attempt to help carve a path from our current world of commodification and commercialisation towards one of creative production and free communications of ideas. Idealistic? Yes indeed.<br />
<span> </span><br />
<em>To find out more about Emily’s current project &#8211; Just Do It: get off your arse and change the world check out the website – <a href="http://www.just-do-it.org.uk/" target="_blank">www.just-do-it.org.uk</a>. Emily will be guest blogging about the project here at Shooting People over the next couple of weeks. Starting tomorrow, and for 20 days, all donations to the project will be matched, pound for pound, but Lush Cosmetics, so go on over and make a donation.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/blog/2010/10/why-i-said-%e2%80%98no%e2%80%99-to-the-broadcasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

