<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shooting People: Shooting From The Hip &#187; strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip/tag/strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip</link>
	<description>Independent film blog connected to Shooting People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Number crunching</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip/2007/11/19/number-crunching/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip/2007/11/19/number-crunching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles/Blogs/Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip/2007/11/19/number-crunching/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Pamela Cohn over at Resources for bringing my attention to Matt Syrett&#8217;s quantitative analysis of film production and distribution.  I&#8217;m pathetically terrified of numbers to the point where I muddle up my 6s and 9s in panic (and my 3s and my 8s if I&#8217;m really freaking out) but as Matt says:
Whether [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to <a href="http://resources.renewmedia.org/2007/11/12/matts-stats/" target="_blank">Pamela Cohn over at Resources</a> for bringing my attention to <a href="http://www.lathrios.com/blog/" target="_blank">Matt Syrett&#8217;s quantitative analysis </a>of film production and distribution.  I&#8217;m pathetically terrified of numbers to the point where I muddle up my 6s and 9s in panic (and my 3s and my 8s if I&#8217;m really freaking out) but as Matt says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Whether you want to make money on your film or just find an audience for your unique vision, marketing should play a central role in your work.</p>
<p>This blog is dedicated to my thoughts on marketing independent film, especially using quantitative analysis. Don’t worry if you failed high school math or know nothing about marketing… my goal is to make the insights approachable by almost anyone.</p></blockquote>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">I have to confess I haven&#8217;t yet summed up the courage to study his conclusions in detail but I&#8217;m interested to see what this sort of analysis brings up &#8211; and I absolutely agree that filmmakers have got to think about the marketing of their work. It&#8217;s about strategically working out how to tell the right people about your  film and get them interested in seeing it. Call it something else if the word itself makes you uncomfortable but do it.</p>
<p align="left">I should do the same with math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip/2007/11/19/number-crunching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Conservatory Syndrome</title>
		<link>http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip/2007/10/22/the-conservatory-syndrome/</link>
		<comments>http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip/2007/10/22/the-conservatory-syndrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles/Blogs/Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fractured Atlas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip2/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arwen Lowbridge over at our friends Fractured Atlas wrote this piece earlier in the summer and I have been meaning to post it for ages. She is writing about artists in the performing arts but I think that many of her points are very salient for filmmakers too and her professional pledges are definitely bang [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arwen Lowbridge over at our friends <a href="http://www.fracturedatlas.org/" title="http://www.fracturedatlas.org/">Fractured Atlas</a> wrote <a href="http://www.fracturedatlas.org/site/blogs/post/developingthearts/7206966459787747772" title="http://www.fracturedatlas.org/site/blogs/post/developingthearts/7206966459787747772">this piece</a> earlier in the summer and I have been meaning to post it for ages. She is writing about artists in the performing arts but I think that many of her points are very salient for filmmakers too and her professional pledges are definitely bang on the money (&#8217;scuse the pun):</p>
<blockquote><p>I will be responsible for my own career and I will conduct myself as a business professional.</p>
<p>Many artists are understandably intimidated by business; but if you avoid learning about it you only hurt yourself. Understanding it will protect your professional interests and give you tools for success. Be proactive and learn whatever is necessary to help you achieve your goals &#8211; seek out the existing resources available to you. You may not consider art to be fundamentally aligned with making money but the two are bedfellows here in the U.S.</p>
<p>I will seek the help of experts when I&#8217;m in unfamiliar territory.</p>
<p>This extends to contract negotiations, business etiquette, grant applications, tax returns and marketing campaigns. If you need professional advice, find it and be prepared to pay for it. Usually a small investment from a qualified professional can save you a lot of money down the road. If you don&#8217;t like the advice you receive, ask around to peers and colleagues for their experience and referrals.</p>
<p>I will value my work in a monetary and a social sense.</p>
<p>Art possesses powerful influence and energy &#8211; don&#8217;t discount this. The work of artists benefits U.S. citizens both socially and economically. Your work should do the same for you: it should generate revenue to pay for your services and make something creatively rewarding for your audience. A simple way to serve both masters is to think locally as much as possible. This can develop your audience, increase your revenue, improve your fundraising potential, and quite possibly change the world. Join advocacy efforts to promote the arts in your area, contact the politicians that represent you and make your concerns as a voter known. Imagine what artists could do if properly organized to engage the civic leadership and create social change.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shootingpeople.org/fromthehip/2007/10/22/the-conservatory-syndrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
