ASK & DISCUSS
INDEXAdvise on web series
9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George
Hi all,
Hope you had a good start into 2016. I'm considering making a web series this year, however I didn't really have experience with this format so far. I did a bit of research, finding comedy is the dominant genre, and that it is about building an audience and not about making money.
Do any of you watch a web series? If so, why do you watch it, do you pay for it, when and on what do you watch it? Would be interesting to see what you think
Stephan
Only members can post or respond to topics. LOGIN
Not a member of SP? JOIN or FIND OUT MORE
9 years, 6 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin
Stephan, if you are going to make money from a web series, it's either going to be from ad revenue through a platform like YouTube, or in-programme sponsorship. For either to be worth anything, you need a lot if regular eyeballs, and that means you need to be entertaining and have a lot of episodes. Lots of episodes as it's a bit if a numbers game, and if someone finds you then they need to have a load of stuff to find.
Last web series I watched was from The Onion, called 'sex house' it was a spoof of 'big brother'-style shows. They'd clearly spent some money on doing a good job of it. But people seem to like all kinds of utter shit on YouTube, so there's space there for lower budget productions. And if you can get regular eyeballs, you can seek sponsorship and make a living.
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George
Hi Paddy, I'm not planning to monetize it, as I'm aware of the difficulty of it. I want to make a web series about a serial killer, so unlike the popular comedies there is already a restricted audience. However I hope to slowly built an audience (I'm aware that I will have to invest a bit into marketing) that might be interested in a feature film with a similar style and subject.
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Chris Regan
Hi Stephan,
I'm working on a webseries right now! I've been keeping a video diary on my youtube page - www.youtube.com/cgregan
Paddy is right, it's definitely about getting views and it's tough sometimes. I'm only ten episodes into mine and we've made it to just under a thousand subscribers and over 7,000 views, but it's felt like we've had to fight for every one of those views at times.
I think it would be a big ask to get people to pay for a web series, unless you had a big name or it was a recognised property, but even then there is so much content out there for free.
Marble Hornets is a really good one to watch if you're interested in seeing how a successful webseries did it.
Hope that helps!
Chris
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Chris Regan SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George
Thanx Chris, interesting making of videos. I noticed that you used both vimeo and YouTube for Jenny Ringo, which one worked better for you in terms of views and feedback?
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Chris Regan
@Stephan George
Vimeo always feels a bit more posh, but depsite having the same functionality I find there's less of a community there. Youtube viewers seem much more inclined to comment and leave feedback, and while I occasionally wish they hadn't I've actually found the Youtube community to be incredibly supportive.
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Chris Regan SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Benjamin Field
Morning!
My experience from The Chronicles of Professor Elemental is that a known name is a must for a high quantity of viewers.
I had 3 episodes and no subscribers. After the first episode I had 25,000 views and 1000 subscribers.
Professor Elemental isn't a huge name but clearly big enough. It was also quite a unique idea so got shared around a bit.
We spent £7,500.00 on the series which we shot in 7 days and took nearly 6 months in Post Production. The series is still being watched now and we made it it 2012.
In terms of Revenue from Youtube, so far, I've made £162.00 and the whole series probably has nearly 70,000 views
We didn't really have a plan for it, as it was made for fun and to see what we could achieve. In hindsight we should have done a lot more with it.
Having said that my Youtube channel now attracts a fair amount of attention.
Hope this is helpful in some way. I'd be happy to discuss your ideas further if you would like.
Cheers
Ben
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Benjamin Field SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George
That's quite impressive numbers you managed to achieve. What was your aim with the webseries, was it an audience, money, etc?
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Benjamin Field
@Stephan George
It was as a proof of concept to show tv execs that there was a market for a full series. The series gave us the ability to detail demographics in quite some detail.
Unfortunately it didn't get the show picked up but it did get us fairly well through the door into some fairly decent discussions which did lead to other things.
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Benjamin Field SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Joe Golby
Stephan
Have really good reason to want to create a web series over say, a short film which you can do the festival circuit with and then online eventually anyway or a low budget feature you might even be able to sell to a distributor. I've had the pleasure of working creatively on stand alone videos for some popular UK YouTubers as well as on a couple successful webseries and it's always interesting to see the different approaches, aims and expectations of each.
Freddie Wong of internet fame created one of the most popular web series on the internet 'Video Game High School' and his conclusion was still "YouTube’s current model cannot financially support long-form high-production value series"
You can read his post mortem after 3 series here http://www.rocketjump.com/blog/vghs-post-mortem.
Sadly a good idea or great concept does not guarantee views or subscribers, most of the 'successful' web series had their audience already in place from other content before they went down that route. It's hard to go from an empty channel to a few thousand subscribers in under 12months If your not putting out regular content. I know of a handful of SciFi and Fantasy web series who have tried to promote their shows at London’s ComiCon which seems like the ideal place to drum up a fan base but none could translate panel talks and posters into significant viewing numbers.
Ben's point of having a name involved is an excellent one, I worked on a webseries '5-a-side' who's cast included a popular YouTuber (11m subs) as well as Keith Duffy of Boyzone and a few other soap actors. It got respectable viewing numbers and is the only web series I know of first hand to have made the mythical leap to TV when it was aired on BT Sport, it still did not retain it's original format and it's 5 web episodes were amalgamated into 2 TV length episodes.
The webseries that most often fails and annoys me personally is the one acting as the director/producer's own wish fulfilment eg: “I want to direct a HBO style fantasy drama". This results in a lot of other peoples money being begged for through crowdfunding sites and a lot of actors and crew being talked into working for free so the director gets to be all directory on the set, blog about how amazing it is for them before finally releasing their creation to the indifferent internet where it gets a couple thousand views and disappears into the ether.
Doing it for fun (the whole crew's), for the love or because you have story you are dying to tell are some of the best reasons.
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Joe Golby SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George
Thanx Joe, lots of great advise here. Especially the post mortem blog is really interesting.
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Marlom Tander
There are many great reasons to make a web series, but making a profit isn't one of them (not unless you have zero production costs).
If you want to make money on YT, look at what makes money. High production values isn't anywhere on the list. Entertainment / infotainment value is pretty much everything.
OTOH if you are happy to lose all the money, then it's great showcase for your skill.
BUT
Metrics can be a two edged sword. If your plan is to leverage up from series to feature you'll be seeking investors for the feature.
First thing they do, go to your web series and look at two things - quality, metrics. Lets assume quality (writing, acting, direction, production) is a given.
It's YT. Anything under a million views is just meh.
The key issue for investors would be that your lack of views translates to a subtext of "can't sell, but wants MY MONEY for a feature?". This isn't an issue so long as you know how to deal with it.
My point isn't that you need a million views, my point is that when you seek funds, you play up the quality of production for cost, and downplay your views. "Of course, our X views is just family and friends because the YT commercial model doesn't make it worth investing anything in marketing/promotion unless it's comedy/kittens/gaming or makeup/fashion! So we focussed our efforts and limited funds on the quality of the result because really, it's a calling card."
It's tempting to say "wow, we got 10,20,30K views which is great compared to others" but just don't do it. If the investor sees the views and knows the comparative numbers and the logic, they'll be impressed. If they don't get it, you telling them sounds like straw clutching at best and, at worst, that you really don't have a clue.
I've got a video on YT with 200K views but that's really because I suspect that a title that includes the words "victorian school punishment" is a bit clickbaity given that the other clips from the same day covering other aspects of a victorian working class life have 200-3000 views.
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Marlom Tander SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Alève Mine
Marlom, is there another distribution channel than YT to show series on, where you can reach audiences? When I send my followers to Vimeo, for most of them the hurdle is much higher, because they have to first register there...
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Alève Mine SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Marlom Tander
@Alève Mine There's nothing to stop you setting up your own site - a cheap host for a few quid a month and powerful free CMS like Drupal make it trivial.
But then your views would be entirely down to your own marketing and promotion, whereas what YT brings is massive network effects that kick in for any content that touches the zeitgeist. Or includes kittens.
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Marlom Tander SHOW
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Alève Mine SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin
@Alève Mine
With bearing in mind that there are still costs associated with having a system fast enough to stream video, which is why there are fewer sites competing than you'd think. There are no stats breaking it out properly ant more, but when there were, YouTube used to lose Google half a billion dollars a year. Clearly you're not going to accept videos from punters, so I'm not comparing like with like, just showing that quality streaming costs (especially if you expect any size of audience, more than one play at a time, etc).
A lot of far bigger, richer sites than mine actually use YouTube to host and stream the video, but then embed that on their own site. It reduces complexity and cost significantly. YouTube manage the hosting, transcodes and resolutions, adaptive bitrate delivery, storage, players and CDN fast delivery.
Channel4 even did a deal with YouTube to reduce their data costs a few years back. Yes, prices fall, but expectations rise, and people are used to immediate streaming without buffering now. I used to dabble in this sector a little, and frankly am glad I walked away - let YouTube carry the overhead and embed your videos in a normal webpage :) the other fast free CDN is Facebook, if you like them. Personally I find Google less intrusive (and that's really saying something), but they have a good CDN for video, apparently.
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Alève Mine
@Paddy Robinson-Griffin
Good point. We're ants, no, quantum particles, compared to such players when it comes to power over bandwidth. There was a decision lately about these things, wasn't there? What was the outcome?
And even if our speed works well, our stats don't add to the numbers shown on youtube, and people flock to where others go, be it in the industry or the audience. I give people both vimeo and youtube links but - assuming a future project shows a serious turn - that divides the hits in two parts, so I'm wondering if it's better to do it differently. You want to raise the numbers people see before viewing. Actually: any hackers here who could do that?
I've checked with the hosting service. They do drupal. I'll try to have to look into that at a later point when I have more time. Substantially modifying a website is always time consuming.
Where there is an alternative, I don't upload my videos, of any type, nor pictures, onto Facebook. I can't say I've read their terms and conditions, but I have a hunch that when you upload something, it's giving them a perpetuity licence to use the content whichever way they wish - is it?
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Alève Mine SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Marlom Tander
@Alève Mine
1) A small site for your video is a very different proposition to hosting other people's, (don't go there).
2) To hack YT just have a bunch of friends view it a lot. Yes, there are View Selling services, but they won't fool anyone running log analysis (which YT does as a matter of course, on an automated basis). It's a good way to get your video suspended.
3) FWIW FB TOS is pretty much the same as every one else's - the licence allows FB to do what they need while the content is up, and not once it's taken down. In the UK a lot of this could be covered by implied terms because without, for example, a royalty free licence to distribute my IP SP couldn't run a forum.
Having said that, SP actually claim a PERPETUAL licence to publish, which is decidedly iffy :-)
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Marlom Tander SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Alève Mine
@Marlom Tander
1) ah nono I won't do that. That would be another business indeed.
2) practical effects :) About that, insights on how to get that to happen with friends, or even with cast&crew (find more ambitious collaborators?), are welcome. That, without funds to campaign, not even to go meet with those friends from time to time so they get a constant sense of you.
3) there should be a clause for them not to misuse this
SP, you gotta change that!
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Alève Mine SHOW
9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George
Is there a dedicated website just dealing with webseries? www.webserieschannel.com/ hasn't been updated since a year, aside from that I couldn't really find anything...
Response from 9 years, 6 months ago - Stephan George SHOW