ASK & DISCUSS
INDEXIs it worth remaking a short if you didn't get it right the first time?
8 years, 5 months ago - David Roberts
This should be a question I should be able to answer myself, in that, am I that enamoured with her project that I want to go through it all again? But there is other reasons. Allow me to elaborate.
My background is writing, acting and directing, with no formal trying, just passion, dedication and a good understanding of the end goal and what it means to get a vision on the screen/page/stage.
I originally wanted to make a short just to see if I could. I also wanted to make it as good as I could and put over £1000 into (which I understand is not much but it's what I had). I picked a script that was easy to film, yet visually imaginative with a quirky story to it. I would say it was as easy to make as any film is going to be (I filmed it at home).
The one thing (I felt) I had little control over was the look of the film. I fully admit to not being knowledgable enough on the technical side of lighting and camerawork, so I trusted in the crew. I'm not apportioning blame to anyone and it could well be my direction was not clear, but I was also led to believe a lot could be done in post. Long story shot - The film was too dark.
I remember feeling at the time that we should have been using some filter light in there or a blue wash or something but I trusted in the expertise of others. Maybe that the old adage about getting it in the camera is easier than trying to fix it later was no longer relevant?
Anyway, I ended up with a fairly decent film. Maybe not precisely what I wanted visually, but no bad for a first attempt. And I figured I'm always going to be a little disappointed with the end result not living up to in my head, right? Good enough for a festival I figured.
So I submit to several film festivals. First to come back I get in. Great! I wait for the rest to accept but then I get a rejection. And another. And another. In fact about 9 festivals rejected it. It's clearly not meeting the standard that is being set today, yet I know this has a strong story. It has a beginning, middle and end, which a lot of shorts don't seem to have. This has got to be a big plus right, something to get over the low production quality?
I get feedback from one of the festivals basically saying great script but too dark. I basically feel that I've wasted a great opportunity to showcase my writing. Yes, I have other projects but the simplicity of this one so appealing, It can be shot in a house, in a day, with two actors, yet it could have such a strong impact if done right.
So there it is. Sorry for the overlong explanation but I felt this needed context.
Thoughts?
Only members can post or respond to topics. LOGIN
Not a member of SP? JOIN or FIND OUT MORE
8 years, 5 months ago - Mark Wiggins
Yes, of course its worthwhile; if you want to. The problem you had the first time is why you need a proper DOP.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Mark Wiggins SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin
How about taking the lessons from this project and applying them to the next? You can go back and reshoot this one if you run out of ideas and scripts in a couple of years with a lot more experience behind you and make a better job of it than you could right now anyway!
Too dark? That could be a stylistic choice of course, or a dodgy camera, or maybe it'll grade out. I'm guessing you didn't have a reference monitor, maybe just for positioning rather than levels during the shoot? Mind you most people don't seem to know how to set up a monitor these days anyway, so it could be a limitation of the crew. £1000 doesn't get you a lot of experience TBH! Anyway, have you tried wrestling it through a regrade? It might be that the detail is lost forever, but if you saw it on the monitor it might be there in the noisy bits. Can you go back to the source footage? Can you tell from a still taken out of the video stream if you can brighten it and find a little more detail? If it's the in the source footage, you don't need to reshoot, probably do need to re-ingest but may be able to use the same EDL before grading brighter. Sometimes people using editing software may not understand the implications of different codecs, which is why ingesting again might be helpful!
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Lee 'Wozy' Warren
Move on. Make the next film. Take the lessons from the first film and use them on the next. Making the same film over and over again is a waste of time. After a while, you'll have a few films made but they'll just be different quality versions of the same thing. And then you'll only ever be able to use the best of the ones you made. So you've wasted time, money and energy. Put those things into the next film.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Lee 'Wozy' Warren SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Nathalie Hickson
Hi David, It would be interesting to see the film if poss. Shame too dark. Just thinking if you could reedit it or something.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Nathalie Hickson SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Mark Wiggins
Could be monitor but then I'm from a generation where the only monitors we had were video taps on film cameras. I strongly believe that if a DOP can't light a set and expose it correctly without a monitor, they shouldn't be calling themselves a DOP. Its what Meters are for. Call me old fashioned. Couldn't be a camera problem, but this shows why you should test all your gear before you shoot.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Mark Wiggins SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - David Roberts
If anyone would like to see the film go here:
http://blackdeathsorbet.wixsite.com/thecheatandgod/the-film
Password: Dream
All fairness to the DOP he did know his stuff and I don't think it was anything to do with a lack of skill or knowledge.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - David Roberts SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Mark Wiggins
I'd say, if I'd shot it I would have pumped up the fill a bit and gone for a less severe lighting ratio but that's just me. In terms of cinematography I think its fine. May be a bit dark for the subject matter but then again, that's me. I think you could do a lighter version in the grade but that depends on what the origianl files are like, how compressed they are etc as that will determine how far you can push things in the grade before they start to fall apart.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Mark Wiggins SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Simon Bolton Gabrielsen
David. For all that you've got a lot of emotion invested in the project, it's almost never worth re-making a film. You could do all the work a second time round and something else won't be quite right. In this game, if you're going backwards, you're not going forwards. Chalk it up to experience and make something better.
On the festivals thing, I've had films in over a hundred festivals, including significant ones. And I've seen good films submitted to dozens of events and not get a single hit. You got lucky with that first acceptance, which is great. But it's frankly completely normal to get waaaaaaaaaaaaaay more rejections than acceptances. If you have a REALLY strong film, the ratio might be as good as five to one. If you got it seen once, you may get it seen again, but at least you made a film that worked in some respects and you can claim one festival success.
I don't often give advice on these things, because it's subjective and who needs it, but in this case I have no hesitation. Move on and move up.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Simon Bolton Gabrielsen SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Lee 'Wozy' Warren
Get rid of that annoying background. It's completely distracting from watching the film...
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Lee 'Wozy' Warren SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Paul Campion
Learn from the experience and make the next film better. The writing is good, so you have a good calling card for the next short, which should attract a more talent on the technical side.
Maybe next time put together a set of moodboards for the look you're after. Spend more time with the DOP before hand discussing how you and he would like to light it. And if you think something is wrong on set, such as it's too dark, then as the director you should step in and ask for more light. You can always grade something darker in post, but you can't grade something brighter if there's no detail in the blacks.
Your writing is good, so you should easily be able to find a really good more experienced DOP next time. I checked your credits and your DOP doesn't have any camera credits, he's a DIT/Colourist/Actor/Editor in that order. That's already way too many hats to be wearing and having your DOP edit the film means he'll be too married to his footage. A separate editor will bring fresh eyes to the film, and will only be focused on the storytelling.
Next time find someone who is just a DOP, and find someone else who is just an editor, and you'll end up with a much better film.
Don't be disheartened by not getting into the festivals. You've made a good well written first film, which already puts you way ahead of everyone else. Next time you just need to up your game as a director and bring together a more experienced crew.
And yeah, that background is really annoying! Vimeo is generally the best platform for hosting your films when you're sending it out to other filmmakers etc.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Paul Campion SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Duncan Roe
It's hard to comment on someone else's experience, so I can only speak from my own. I directed a short no budget film 4 years ago. Great actors, good script but I fucked up the shoot. It was definitely on me as my DOP was fantastic. Long story short - the project never moved on from the rough edit as I felt it wasn't up to scratch. Last year we dug out the script and shot it again. We've just started the festival run and it's screening at BFI Flare this Saturday. I suppose there are a few things that I took from the experience that might not apply to you - but the one thing I will say is that there are no rules. If you want to shoot your film again, shoot it again. Haneke did it with Funny Games.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Duncan Roe SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - simon drake
I reshot a short film (that i produced) into a feature film (that i directed). The short was a great script but a bit of a train wreck (i was inexperienced and the DOP was a complete clown, and refused to listen to the female director due to gender and her inexperience. Although his cinematography was TERRIBLE. Whenever challenged he'd parrot that his Dad had won an Oscar (which he had...) but his cinematography still stank, but we didnt challenge enough as we were less experienced/confident. He then refused to give or show us the rushes when he obviously realised he'd completely screwed up and couldn't edit his own shots together! He then blamed the script when his rough edit was challenged! I eventually got the rushes after years (the director had walked from the project as her first experience was a nightmare and the film looked a joke!) I re-edited a version that totally changed the original script. But it reminded me the script was great but the footage wasn't. So after several years (and making a feature film to boost my confidence) i adapted her short into a feature script and directed it myself with close friends/crew who were a better fit to control the project more. If it's a story that hasn't reached it's full potential, i'd say expand it. But always outstretch your grasp to move forward. So either make a bunch more shorts to practice (i have no film school/college experience, i just made a bunch of shorts, then two features!) then follow your instinct and reshoot it as a feature maybe? You can use what you've learned on the short, but push forward into a bigger project.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - simon drake SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Jez Lewis
I seldom comment but this is the most interesting question I've seen raised on SP. All advice ao far seems sound to me, but the fact that there's no overall consensus seems to confirm what Duncan Roe says - there are no rules (also said to me by Nick Broomfield when I asked him what's the most important thing to know about film-making). Personally I try to do what I'm really compelled to do, and if I'm unsure I try to imagine lying on my deathbed and looking back on what I regret and what I feel proud of. It's a good short, one to be proud of I'd say, whatever you decide. Good luck!
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Jez Lewis SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Tony Oldham
The hit rate for getting into festivals can be about 10%, so that's a reasonable success rate.
I knew one producer who's short had been in somewhere like 50 festivals; a successful film right? /// But he also said he'd submitted it to over 500 festivals - so similar success rate. You always need to submit to about 20 plus festivals & unfortunately, that also adds about another £500 to your marketing budget!!
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Tony Oldham SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Paul W Franklin
Hi,
To answer the question - it feels to me like if you don't remake it, it's going to bug you forever. So I say DO IT.
It's a simple enough shoot, and you can remake it for far less than £1,000. If you know a willing DoP with a half decent camera who'll do it for expenses, great. (I'd be curious to know what camera it was filmed on).
As for the darkness etc - Yes, it's way too dark. A film can be 'dark' but still be lit enough so we can see what we need to see, e.g. the actors' faces! The fairy lights and lights from the oven hood are blown out/too bright. Look at the latter at 2:54 - not good. It's hard to know what directions you gave the DoP and whether he was just following your orders, but - to be completely frank - it's appallingly lit. Going back to the grade and trying to brighten it isn't going to help.
I say: find another DoP who wants to do something interesting with light & dark, and remake it on a shoestring. You've still got the music, costumes (location obviously) etc, so go for it.
P.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Paul W Franklin SHOW
8 years, 5 months ago - Peter Tickler
Hi, You definitely need a different DOP. My son is pretty handy - as you can see from this film shot in China over one night with minimal equipment and no crew. https://vimeo.com/110480017 He is now based in London. Contact me via petertickler@btinternet.com if you are interested.
Response from 8 years, 5 months ago - Peter Tickler SHOW