ASK & DISCUSS
INDEXLaser pointers and eye safety
10 years, 2 months ago - Ewan Bailey
Hi
I'm in production on a short that requires a laser pointer to be aimed at an actor's forehead (from close range - ie. less than a foot). Paramount in my mind is safety on set. Reading the Govt guidelines it says laser pointers should never be aimed at anyone's head.
At the moment I'm assuming we need to go back to the script and find a way to achieve the same effect without the lasers. However, visually and in story terms it doesn't help us. Just wondering if anyone has had any experience with this kind of issue? Other than changing the script or putting the laser in in post (which I suspect will look shit) does anyone know of a safe work around?
The only thing I've thought of is the possibility of some kind of safety contact lens. But that may be science fiction. That, or a laser so weak it is harmless.
I should emphasise that at no point in the script is the laser supposed to be shone into the eyes. It's only supposed to be on the skin of the forehead. However, the set up would need to be foolproof, from the safety POV.
Cheers
Only members can post or respond to topics. LOGIN
Not a member of SP? JOIN or FIND OUT MORE
10 years, 2 months ago - Jon (Jack) Gritton
I think the snoot is unlikely to produce the effect you're looking for. Something like a straw is going to severely restrict the amount of light hitting the target and the scatter will be huge. For it to get even close to producing a laser-like "dot" you'd probably have to have the end of the straw virtually touching the forehead and a big lamp behind it and that'll make the shot difficult, to say the least. The other problem with using a lamp is that it won't have that peculiar "look" of a laser dot and won't have a visible track in the air (if you wanted that) as there won't be enough coherence and power.
The goggle's may be an option, but to me that sounds a lot like firing a live bullet at an actor wearing a bullet-proof vest - you've still got the risk of an accident.
I'd go with Lee's suggestion and do it in oat - sorry, post (Lee - you now have to make a post tool called "Oat", I was about to search for it!). Though how good the effect will be will depend upon your budget...
The ideal solution is really not to point it at the head full stop. Unless there's a specific reason to use the forehead as a target (that's where the alien is, that's the only way to kill the zombie, etc.) I'd just use the chest.
Response from 10 years, 2 months ago - Jon (Jack) Gritton SHOW
Response from 10 years, 2 months ago - Lee 'Wozy' Warren SHOW
10 years, 2 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin
How to make one? I'd start with a torch, a drinking straw, some low light and some gaffer tape and you'll know within 10 minutes if it's going to work - from there it's just more creative bodge work!
Response from 10 years, 2 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin SHOW
10 years, 2 months ago - Lee 'Wozy' Warren
Yes, use the oat plugging... no only kidding. I'd be happy to take a look and do a test for you as a post FX. IM me the details if you like.
Wozy
Response from 10 years, 2 months ago - Lee 'Wozy' Warren SHOW
10 years, 2 months ago - Ewan Bailey
Thanks for all answers so far. Yes, post is looking the likely route, but would prefer to do it on the day - time & money. Can cove the eyes on closer shots, but there'll need to be a wider shot of the action featuring the eyes.
The snoot sounds interesting - need to look up how to make one. Does anyone have a link?
No mad scientists, sadly...
Response from 10 years, 2 months ago - Ewan Bailey SHOW
10 years, 2 months ago - Lee 'Wozy' Warren
Why not do it in oat? That would be fairly straight forward and you'd have more control and no H&S issues...
Response from 10 years, 2 months ago - Lee 'Wozy' Warren SHOW
10 years, 2 months ago - Marlom Tander
They can be pointed at people's heads.
They shouldn't be pointed at people's eyes.
So if it's a close up you need, cover the eyes with an opaque mask, then turn the pointer on, and get the forehead close up. Then turn it off.
More info - and suggests that you should also check that your pointer is a Class 2 laser, no stronger. (All you need to ruin your day is an accident with a Class 3 and an actor proud of their ability to control their reflexes!).
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/laser-radiation-safety-advice/laser-radiation-safety-advice
Though really, I prefer Paddy's snoot. Thinks --- by making a multicoloured gel and pulling it through you'll change the colour of the dot. Does your scene include an evil scientist "Dial it up to BLUE, Igor". And watch it ratchet through the rainbow. You can't do that with normal laser pen, even a red/green colour switch one :-)
Response from 10 years, 2 months ago - Marlom Tander SHOW
10 years, 2 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin
Could you make a snoot (you can home-make one with straws and gaffer tape I'd have thought) on a normal small domestic torch with some red gel? The snoot will effectively parralelise the beam enough to give you a small dot. Otherwise post-production needn't look bad, depends how long you need it in the shot :-)
Response from 10 years, 2 months ago - Paddy Robinson-Griffin SHOW